Return
to Story Page
To print: Select File and then Print from your
browser's menu
Vandana Saxena
Mumbai, Feb 27: The public interest litigation (PIL) filed against the 1,082 mw Bhadravati power project at the Nagpur high court will be examined for admission next month. It was to be discussed for admission on February 16.Filed by Banwari Lal Purohit, the PIL has challenged the power purchase agreement (PPA) arguing that the cost of the project is high. It also alleges that some individuals have backed the project. The PPA between the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and power company was signed in 1998.
The high court has asked the parties concerned, including MSEB and the promoters of the project, to submit their response to the allegations made by the petitioner. MSEB is likely to reply shortly.
The thermal power plant will source coal from the Central India Coal Company (Cisco), the company being set up by the same promoters to cater to the entire demand of the power project.
Purohit had earlier filed a petition against the setting up of the power project based on the captive coalcompany. He argued that the development of the coal mines which are located close to a defence facility are against the interests of the country and unsafe. However, the committee set up to examine the issue has okayed the coal project with some conditions.The project is presently tying funds for the project and though the court has not admitted the petition yet, the prospects of this happening may discourage some potential investors.
The Supreme Court, in a recent verdict, had directed the high courts to exercise caution in PILs challenging infrastructure projects as these cause delays in the plans. In turn, this inconveniences the public and affects industrial and economic development.The apex court also ruled that PILs and private parties obtaining stay on projects should be made liable for cost escalations if the petition fails in the court. The verdict is primarily intended to avoid frivolous cases. While industry experts have welcomed this decision, they believe that quick decisions in these mattersare also important. The merit of such petitions should be decided quickly because the uncertainty of the legal outcome also affects the projects.
Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------
This story was printed from Net Express located at http://www.expressindia.com. Net Express provides a portal to India, with news from The Indian Express and The Financial Express along with sites on travel and tourism, the entertainment industry, the power sector, the environment and much more.
------------------------------------------------------------