Return
to Story Page
To print: Select File and then Print from your
browser's menu
PRESS TRUST OF INDIA
NEW DELHI, FEB 22: The Supreme Court today admitted a petition of the Tamil Nadu government challenging the validity of the recent notification by the Centre transferring all corruption cases against AIADMK supremo Jayalalitha from special judges to sessions courts.
A Division Bench comprising Justices G T Nanavati and S P Kudukar, while admitting the petition filed by the state's Advocate General fixed March 8 for further hearing on it.
Counsel for the Advocate General, Fali S Nariman said the Centre's February 5 notification did not affect the state government's April 30, 1997, order appointing three special judges to exclusively try 46 corruption cases against Jayalalitha, some of her erstwhile Cabinet colleagues and certain bureaucrats as the latter was done with the consent of the Madras High Court.
However, Attorney General Soli Sorabjee contested the claim of Nariman saying ``not withstanding any other legal position, the central notification prevails over the state notification.''
Nariman saidthat as the state government's April 30 order was supported by the Central government during hearing of Jayalalitha's appeal in the Madras High Court against the appointment of three special judges, the present notification would have no legal sanctity.
The Advocate General of Tamil Nadu stated in his petition that ``the February 5 notification issued by the Government of India do not in any way affect the group of cases (regarding to Jayalalitha) which are already allocated by the state government on April 30, 1997 after consultation with Madras High Court.''
In the alternative, he requested the apex court to issue an appropriate order quashing or altering the central notification as it violated the basic structure of Constitution of India which guaranteed independence of judiciary.
The Central Government had issued the notification claiming that it alone had the power under Section 4(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act to order transfer of cases from one court to another.
The state government hadunder Section 3(1) of the Act transferred the cases on April 30, 1997, to the three special judges for a speedy trial.
The three special judges at Chennai had refused to acknowledge the central notification and were at present going ahead with the proceedings in the cases against Jayalalitha and others.
Copyright © 1999 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------
This story was printed from Net Express located at http://www.expressindia.com. Net Express provides a portal to India, with news from The Indian Express and The Financial Express along with sites on travel and tourism, the entertainment industry, the power sector, the environment and much more.
------------------------------------------------------------