
| Font Size |



“The priority has been fixed by the government. We can only go in the priority sectors decided by the government. We have been asked to focus on the IT sector,” said CISF’s Additional Director General Manjari Jaruhar. “Hotels are low on our priority right now. They have security from the state governments and they can always hire private security on their own.” While IT, power and oil industries have been put on the top priority list, five-star hotels are on Priority 3 as of now.
In the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, which targeted the Taj and the Oberoi hotels, many reputed hotel chains, including Taj and Trident, had sought CISF cover. While the Taj Group had sought CISF security for Taj Hotel in Mumbai, the Trident Hotels had asked for a similar cover at eight locations, including Mumbai. Other prominent hotels seeking CISF security included Marriott in Mumbai and Jaypee Group of Hotels at eight locations.
“We have got 107 requests from private sector so far. Out of these, 33 requests are from industries falling in Priority 1 which includes IT, power and oil industries. We have provided cover to two industries so far,” CISF Director General N R Das said. “We don’t deploy our force on every request we get from the private sector. We first make an analysis of the threat perception. We study things like location of the industry, the area, and the type of industry,” he said, adding that there had been a surge in requests for CISF cover post-26/11.
Following the expansion of its role wherein it was mandated with guarding private establishments, the CISF has provided 101 security personnel to Infosys Technologies and 68 personnel to the Electronics City, both in Bangalore. The Reliance Jamnagar refinery and IT major Wipro look set to get CISF security in days to come. Other private establishments seeking CISF cover include Reliance (Kakinada project),Delhi Public School (three branches in Delhi) and Torrent Powers (Ahmedabad).


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


This NEWS is tantamount to threat to national security. I am one of the individuals who works in one of the premises mentioned. It sends jitters to me that such detailed information has been put. This is not NEWS, this is leakage of sensitive information. What a reporting, would your paper have the guts to print how many commandos protect our PM. Then how could you print specific numbers of security at these premises. An apology is required by you after taking off this NEWS from your site.
This is most irresponsible reporting, I must say. Something that would have taken terrorists a mole in the Home Ministry and a few months to uncover is freely dished out in your newspaper! As they say, with friends like this, who needs enemies.