"I think so. Gen V K Singh is a very honourable man. The Army rests on the basis of honour and integrity...I don't think he will compromise on honour unless he was driven to it," he said when asked if the Army chief was forced to go to the Supreme Court on the age issue.

Gen Singh filed a petition before the Supreme Court last week challenging government's orders which had determined his date of birth to be May 10, 1950 and not May 10, 1951, which would have given him an extra ten months in office.

Asked if the Army chief was justified in approaching the court on the issue, Roychowdhury said, "Yes, of course, he can. Should he have gone to court, that is an issue which has to judged on the basis of overall events."

"It must be examined whether the chief was placed in a position by events in the background and how long they have been going around...Can a chief be placed in certain position by turn of events, the rulings of Defence Ministry where he has no option but to go to court," he said speaking to Karan Thapar in Devil's Advocate programme.

Queried if it was right for a serving Army chief to have approached the court, Roychowdhury said, "If a serving major or a colonel can go to court, I don't see why a Chief can't go to court... He is an army person with an army persons' rights."

When pointed out that armies across the world were supposed to obey orders, the former Army chief said, "There are organisations that take advantage of these principles and force things on army which it does not like."

On whether accepting 1950 as his year of birth would vitiate Gen Singh's case, Roychowdhury said, "I would like to say that we should go into circumstances that made him declare that 1950 was his date of birth. What were the circumstances and what were the pressures put on him, we don't know."

He said Gen Singh Singh would have accepted 1950 as his date of birth in writing "under pressure" and dismissed suggestions that he was putting self before service on the issue.

Roychowdhury said if anything affects the career of an officer and "particularly getting the top spot, if at that juncture some person or organisation says that unless you sign this undertaking, you will not be promoted. This would bring severe pressure on him".

He said the government should have "handled the issue in a better manner and shown more understanding... The Defence Ministry is guilty of not putting broad approach to the issue. Minister should have exercised judgement".