
| Font Size - |
Lawyers for Mohamed Haneef, 28, have spoken of a A$1 million ($909,000) compensation claim, claiming his career has been ruined by his brush with Australian law.
But Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty said Haneef had been dealt with fairly under Australian law.
"Every step we have taken has had some form of judicial oversight," Keelty told lawmakers from the upper house Senate, adding Haneef's lawyers had yet to make contact.
Haneef was held without charge on July 2 last year under tough new anti-terrorism laws and accused of aiding the British plot until Australia's public prosecutor withdrew charges on July 27, leading to a backlash over police handling of his case.
The case has become a rallying point for human rights critics of anti-terrorism laws, which were gradually strengthened by the conservative government after the Sept. 11, 2001 airliner attacks on the United States.
Former Governor-General Bill Hayden said Haneef's case was "frightening and appalling" in a democratic country.
The country's Labor government, elected in November, will soon announce a judicial inquiry into Haneef's case, but Keelty said his force had not changed its methods after a review.
"We have absolutely nothing to hide," Keelty said.
Australia has never suffered a peacetime militant attack on home soil, although a total of 30 people have been charged with terrorism related offences in Australia, with two convicted and sentenced.
Keelty said Haneef's case had cost at least A$7.5 million and involved more than 470 police and customs agents in three states, as well as the United Kingdom, requiring 16 telephone intercepts, six surveillance devices and 22 search warrants.
"We have reviewed the Haneef matter as a matter of course and there's nothing that's arisen out of those reviews that required us to alter our policies or alter our approaches," Keelty said.

| Bookmark this Page |
|

UPA Govt will compensate.These charecters like Haneef are adisgrace to India.
Rejection of the claim of Haneef for damages, against the Australian Govt. is sure be taken as an insult to India as Haneef belongs to the most pampered minority community in Indian i.e. Muslims. The Govt. should threaten the Australian Govt. with breaking off diplomatic realtions if Haneef's claim for damages is not accepted. Even if this threat does not work, the UPA Govt.hould pay the claimed damages to Haneef from Govt. treasury to ensure Muslim votes in the future elections.
Threaten Australian Govt? You must be thinking of the BCCI making threats in cricket. That doesn't work in the real world. Breaking off diplomatic relationships over someone who has contact with terrorists??? You must be just stupid Mohan.India can pay him because Australia NEVER will support people with terrorist contacts.
Dont worry..Indian government will give him $2Million ...he is a minority...
The visit was useful. Content was really very informative. From http://www.giftwithlove.com
| Most Read Articles |