www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

High Court asks Wipro chairman Premji to file reply

Font Size

Express news service

Posted: Jan 17, 2012 at 0313 hrs IST

Mumbai In a defamation suit filed by the owner of the retail chain Subhiksha, the Bombay High Court on Monday asked Wipro chairman Azim Premji to file his written statement in the case.

Owner of Subhiksha, R Subramanian, had filed a defamation suit against Premji seeking damages of Rs 500 crore.

Subramanian had contended that in an interview given to a leading economic daily on March 11, 2010, Premji had made statements against Subhiksha that gravely affected its business prospects.

According to the defamation suit, Premji “...shares much repute among the business fraternity of India and whose views have considerable influence not only among the business fraternity but also public in general.”

Subramanian’s suit alleges that Premji’s statements in the interview were made with a malafide intention. The contents of the interview when read as a whole, apart from the individual sentences, constitute gross defamation, says the suit.

On Monday, at the hearing before the Prothonotary and Senior Master of the court, Premji’s lawyers said the claims made in Subramanian’s suit have to be supported with documents and they would, hence, like to inspect the documents. Subramanian’s lawyers, however, said all the documents have been attached at exhibits to the suit.

Premji, through his personal investment entity, Zash Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, had, in 2008, bought a 10 per cent share in Subhiksha for Rs 230 crore. The stake was bought from ICICI ventures.

Subramanian alleges in his suit that through February to June 2009 his company was in restructuring talks with Wipro to revive its business and it was during these negotiations that Premji’s company demanded a larger equity stake, which they refused.

Having been spurned in his efforts to get a larger stake in the company and in respect of his efforts to get priority for repayment of loans of his company (Wipro), Premji had developed a deep-rooted malice towards the company and its director, the defamation suit states.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Ramnath Goenka Awards: Express Group honours the best in Indian journalism

Army chief takes govt to Supreme Court over age row

Pakistan crisis: Supreme Court holds PM Gilani in contempt

Nothing famous or infamous about Babri demolition, it's just an incident: SC...

India and China begin talks; border issue, Tibet on agenda

Mumbai rash driver Alistair Pereira surrenders before court

On campaign trail, Priyanka tells workers to bury difference, avoid groupism...

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map