
| Font Size - |
In discussion boards and letters to editors, several people have called Tony Singh a "local hero" and expressed support for him. They believe he should be given a bravery award for grappling with his assailant who had a history of criminal acts.
Singh, 34, who owns a shop in Skelmersdale in Lancashire, was leaving for home after closing his shop last Sunday when he was attacked by a hooded man who tried to rob him.
During the struggle to defend himself, Singh took possession of the robber's knife, and in the scuffle, the assailant, identified as Liam Kilroe, died after suffering a stab wound in the chest.
Police said they were preparing a report for the Crown Prosecution Service, which will decide whether to charge Singh, who was also injured during the fight, over the death.
A posting on a Lancashire discussion board said: "The man should have a medal pinned to his chest - not having the thought of imprisonment looming over him. It appears he was simply protecting himself in a life and death struggle. I have not one ounce of pity for the criminal." Roger Moreton, from Warwickshire, wrote: "Far from being prosecuted, or even arrested, the plucky shopkeeper Tony Singh, should be given a bravery award."
The current law permits people to use "reasonable force" to defend themselves and others. Critics claim it is weighted in favour of the criminal.
Singh, who required hospital treatment for knife injuries to his neck and back, has been quizzed by detectives from Lancashire Police's Major Incident Team.
The case is likely to re-open the debate about householders being allowed to use force to defend themselves and their properties. Singh said that he feared he could have been killed in the encounter.

| Bookmark this Page |
|

Does anyone remember the UK police chasing down and killing that innocent Brazilian? they shot him in the head 7 times (by no definitions "reasonable" force) , no one was punished for that. How come this shopkeeper is being punished?
This is an exemplary case as model for the Insian society to learn a lesson from such thoughtful population ,recommending an award for the bravery shown by the victim of the assault but accused of murder.Tony singh deserves a pet on the back "shabash".
Simple facts:1. if someone uses deadly force against one, then what should one do.2. apply deadly force as a lesser amount of force will not work best in this situation3. what is the outcome of deadly force: it is well known- either a person will die or be gravely hurt, and if this result is not produced, then the amount of force by definition can not be deadly especially in hand to hand, or low tech fighting.Is the law wrong or wrongly worded. NO, as it protects against misuse by criminals, mutilation of body, and collateral injuries to other uninvolved persons could occur such as in gunfire. 4th point to remember: do not expect an easy exit even from a life and death encounter, even if one survives. Law will be grilling the survivor even if non-agressor. It is both good and bad. In India it can be even worse, with corruption at so many levels.
| Most Read Articles |