- Weather | Horoscope | Stocks
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShoppingTendersClassifieds OpinionsTravel Career
| Make this your homepage | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Calcutta HC slaps contempt notice on green card holder

Font Size -

Agencies

Posted online: Friday , July 25, 2008 at 01:01:32


Kolkata, July 25: The Calcutta High Court has issued a contempt notice against a Green Card holder in the US after his estranged wife complained that her husband was citing an US court direction over the custody of their child, while not complying with its orders.

Adrija Mukherjee Biswas claimed before the court that her husband Debasish has initiated several proceedings against her in a Pennsylvania court.

Her lawyer Biswajit Basu claimed before the court that since the parties were governed by Indian laws and an Indian court having jurisdiction over the matter passed an order on the custody of the child, the husband by obtaining orders from a US court has committed contempt of the Indian court.

Basu submitted that as the couple was married in India and were citizens of India during the marriage, it was the Indian law which had jurisdiction over the case.

Debasish, originally a resident of South Kolkata, and now working as a computer engineer at Delaware in Pennsylvania, married Adrija under the Special Marriage Act here in 2001.

They went to Delaware after the marriage and had a child in January 2006. However, differences cropped up and following prolonged disputes, Adrija returned to her father's home here with her child.

Adrija filed a case under section 498A (marital torture) and also a matrimonial suit seeking divorce at Alipore district court in Kolkata.

In the suit she prayed that Debasish be not allowed to take the away the child as she was the natural guardian, which the court rejected. Adrija then moved the high court.

Hearing the matter ex parte, Justice Banerjee passed an interim injunction on July nine restraining the husband from taking away the child. Basu said that a copy of the order was mailed to the husband in the US and that it had been received.

He said that following this, Debasish had reportedly initiated proceedings against his wife in the district court in Delaware and had also claimed that she had violated orders in this regard.

Adrija then initiated contempt proceedings against Debasish for trying bypass the Indian judicial process and also attached copies of the proceedings at the Delaware court that the husband had sent to Adrija.

Hearing her counsel, Justice Banerjee on July 11 issued contempt notice against the husband and directed him to reply within four weeks.

Rate this Article
8
Rating
Bookmark this Page
Ads by Google
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
Child Abducted to India by Gope Lalwani on 26 Jul 2008

Child born in USA is USA Citizen by birth.Child has traveled to India on USA Passport.How Indian Visa was issued without fathers signature.Who obtained USA Passport?This is not only legal issue but also Immigrationand International Child Abduction Issue.As per Indian Visa, Child can only remain in India for six months, after expiry of 6 monthschild will be ILLEGAL in India and liable for deportation.

Right to Equality by Virag on 26 Jul 2008

When the child is born in USA, how does India become the jurisdiction in the case? Also, 'alleged torture' happened in USA, how was 498A taken in cognizance in India? If the wife did not have that much money, why did she marry an NRI? Contempt of court has been done by the wife and not by the husband.

Bised law by D.S.Rao on 26 Jul 2008

this jurdgement is very bised since marriage is took place in india jurigection inida but child is born in US jurigection should be US not the india. this very worng jurdgement because wife took the child with out a permision of the husband or the court of US ware father has same right on child. unfatunately in india law is made in such a way if your wife is wants to live you will be no more husband except Free ATM machine and formar farmer who produce the sheed and enjoying some else. and he is abuse under criminal law. in fact mentel curealty in US case registered in India duble standed law in india is teaching a law to innocent people. howlong this terrerism will continue i don't know god bless those men.

This is dadagri by indian court by Swarup Sarkar on 26 Jul 2008

When india do not follow the USA court judgement, why USA should folow Indian court judgement?We need a lot of effort to stop such biased legal terrorism by indian court and judges.Why she marry a NRI, if she is not capable to fight the case in thier coutry? Indian court must respect the other country's judgement, if they want respect from other courty. Even USA lower court trash the Indian supreme court judgements.

© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map