- Weather | Horoscope | Stocks
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShoppingTendersClassifieds OpinionsTravel
| Make this your homepage | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Errors obvious, umpires' focus inadequate: Waugh

Font Size -

Agencies

Posted online: Thursday , January 03, 2008 at 12:00:00
Updated: Thursday , January 03, 2008 at 01:17:59


Sydney, January 3: With the umpiring howlers against India in the second Test kicking up a storm, former Australian skipper Steve Waugh has urged the ICC to do away with the outdated neutral officials’ policy, as it prevented the world's best umpire -- local Simon Taufel -- from standing in the series.

"The world's No1 umpire for the past three years is Simon Taufel from Sydney and he should be out in the middle making the crucial decisions under pressure for this is what the best aspire to," Waugh wrote in his column for the Daily Telegraph.

Blunders by West Indian Steve Bucknor and Englishman Mark Benson hit India hard on the first day of the second Test against Australia and Waugh felt the duo's mistakes showed that neutral umpires not always guarantee error-free matches.

"With the top players now earning millions of dollars and several cricket boards' revenues being upward of hundreds of millions, surely the game is entitled to see the best umpires officiating in the premium Test matches even if they are from the home countries," Waugh said.

Waugh said the concept of neutral umpires was valid only in the times, when technology was not there to assist on-field officials.

"I believe the argument for neutral umpires was valid years ago, when there was a degree of acceptance for mediocrity due to a lack of television cameras and part-time officials, while the scourge of match-fixing was also lurking beneath the surface," Waugh explained.

"However, with today's greater transparency and professionalism a substandard performance means a stint on the sidelines and, to me, the best should be umpiring the premium fixtures. To have at least four obvious errors in one day is not bad luck, just inadequate concentration," he pointed out.

Another Australian legend Ian Healy, meanwhile, suggested that captains be given the choice of challenging a close decision.

"Maybe that would help players feel like they were getting the right decision, and an umpire wouldn't have that feeling in his heart that he's wrecked a Test," Healy said on Channel 9.

Bookmark this Page
  • Digg

    On Digg, users share intersting online content by submitting links to the site. At that point, the Digg audience can vote on whether or not they think it is interesting. Articles with lots of votes, or "diggs," rise up higher on the site's main page and topical subsection pages. Another form of social sharing, this site also lets users categorize the content they are submitting to Digg and label it with descriptions of up to 350 characters. Digg users can also submit comments on each content item submitted to the site.

    To register, go to: http://digg.com/register

    del.icio.us

    At its most basic level, del.icio.us allows users to save their bookmarks online. Del.icio.us also gives users the ability to "tag" their bookmarks with descriptive category names. For example, someone who has bookmarked multiple Web pages that deal with the Washington Nationals baseball team could tag those links with any terms they want, like "baseball," "nationals," "natsfan," etc.

    As members of a "social bookmarking" community, del.icio.us sers can also see how many other people have bookmarked the same pages, and they can look at those users' bookmark collections to find other interesting online content.

    To register, go to: http://del.icio.us/register

    Reddit

    Reddit allows users to submit news articles and other online content to the site. Users also give articles a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. Reddit then uses those votes to build a user profile and to find articles to recommend to you. Users can also submit comments on items posted to the site.

    To register, go to: http://reddit.com/login

Rate this Article
5
Rating
Ads by Google
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
Umpiring by Michael on 04 Jan 2008

An error is an error, whether major or minor. This morning, Tendulkar was absolutely plumb LBW to Michael Clarke - not given.Yesterday, Laxman was absolutely plumb LBW - not given.Was this deliberate?Get the best umpires umpiring regardless of background, with each captain having 2 or 3 technology based challenges per innings.

Umpiring by shonums on 04 Jan 2008

I think we should have the captains involved in being able to challenge the out decisions .We should also have a coner for the umpires to watch the action again REPLAY ACTION . this would make the game as accurate as it can be .

Cricket Unpires by Praveen on 03 Jan 2008

I dont blame Bucknor for his decisions. He is a known India basher. Remember the occasion when he mimicked Indian bowler, when he appealed? Rather it is a wonder the Indian Board has not raised any complaint against this specific umpire. We ought to condemn his actions and let him not officiate any match in which India participates.

4 obvious errors show inadequate concentration by meher on 03 Jan 2008

The suggestion of Steve waugh deserves serious consideration.With TV cameras installed allover,there is no need for a neutral unpires.If an umpires makes a mistake, it can be easily located in TV and rectified as it has happened in the past.

Errors obvious, umpires' focus inadequate: Waugh by N.S.CHAKRAVARTHY on 03 Jan 2008

It is an excellent idea to change the rules and allow Captains to question incorrect umpiring decisions based on their cricketing perceptions. In such an event, use of technology to arbitrate and deliver the final judgement should be a part of the amended rule.

SaCK THE UMPIRES, FINE THEM by Cogito_ergo... on 03 Jan 2008

The bad decisions by Benson and Bucknor, along with the "third umpire", were not bluanders. They were deliberate perversions. The three hould be sacked rightaway mnd their match fees should be forfeited. They should also be fined 100 times the amount of their match fees and the amount handed over to the players who were victims of their crime.

Sree ate with Bhajji after being slappedGovt to sign N-deal 'come what may' : Congre...'Not clinching N-deal will be a historical m...Suniel Shetty making underworld bully me, sa...We should have supported N-deal a year ago: ...Majority of Muslims not against the N-deal: ...

© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map