www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

'Furiuos' Kayani demands clarification from PM Gilani

Font Size

Reuters

Posted: Jan 15, 2012 at 1332 hrs IST

Islamabad Pakistan's army chief is furious with the prime minister for statements criticising the army and has demanded that they be clarified or withdrawn, a senior military source said.

Recent tension has raised fears for the stability of the country and exposed a struggle between the government and the military, which has ousted three civilian governments in coups since independence in 1947 and has ruled the nation for more than half of its history.

The army chief complained to the president about the prime minister's statements, and said they needed to be either clarified or withdrawn, the source said.

He said such statements were divisive and made the country more vulnerable.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani this week criticized Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani and the director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence agency Lieutenant-General Ahmed Shuja Pasha for filing court papers in a case involving a mysterious memo that has pitted the military against the civilian government.

In an interview with Chinese media, Gilani said the filings were unconstitutional, infuriating the military's high command, who issued a stern press release.

There can be no allegation more serious than what the honourable prime minister has levelled, it said.

This has very serious ramifications with potentially grievous consequences for the country.

Gilani further infuriated the army on Wednesday by sacking the defence secretary, retired Lieutenant General Naeem Khalid Lodhi, for gross misconduct and illegal action which created misunderstanding between institutions.

Lodhi was the most senior civil servant responsible for military affairs, a post usually seen as the military's main advocate in the civilian bureaucracy.

The army is not going to concede an inch, said Najam Sethi, editor of The Friday Times. Reconciliatory statements are for form, the demanding statement is the bottom line. The army is not going to do anything directly, the army will wait for the Supreme Court to lay down the rules and will back it to the hilt.

As angry as Kayani is, the military source said, the council of senior military commanders is even more angry. There is a lot of pressure by the main corps commanders on the army chief regarding the statements of the prime minister.

The military, which sets foreign and security policies, drew rare public criticism after U.S. special forces killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden on Pakistani soil in a raid in May 2011, an act seen by many Pakistanis as a violation of sovereignty.

Pakistanis rallied behind the military after a Nov. 26 cross-border NATO air attack killed 24 Pakistani soldiers on the frontier with Afghanistan, driving ties with Washington to their lowest point in years.

My sense is that the PM is also at the end of his tether, Sethi added. I think his view is that we've done everything for these guys, and these guys have embarrassed us time and again. ... And these people have not once stood by us. And that is actually an accurate description of the ground realities.

The army's fury is cause for serious concern for the civilian government, and Gilani and President Asif Ali Zardari went on a charm offensive on Saturday.

Our government and parliament, and above all our patriotic people, have stood fully behind our brave armed forces and security personnel, Gilani said at a cabinet defence committee meeting also attended by Kayani.

It has been my government's policy to allow and enable all state institutions to play their role in their respective domains, he added.

Earlier, Zardari met Kayani in an attempt to mend fences.

The current security situation was discussed, a presidential spokesman said, without giving any details.

Pakistan's politicians and media pundits have been abuzz with rumours of a possible coup since the memo controversy erupted in October.

The disputed memo - allegedly from Zardari's government, seeking U.S. help in reining in the generals - has pushed relations between the civilian leadership and the military, to their lowest point since the last military coup in 1999.

The latest crisis also troubles Washington, which wants smooth ties between civilian and military leaders so that Pakistan can help efforts to stabilise neighbouring Afghanistan, a top priority for President Barack Obama.

Gilani's office denied a report on Friday that the prime minister this week called the British High Commissioner in Islamabad, expressing concerns that the army might be about to mount a coup, and asking for London to support the government.

An official at the high commission also denied the report.

The problem really is the army doesn't want to be associated with this government and its leaders at any level in the public imagination, Sethi said. It wants to be seen as resisting them, standing up to them, rather than following them or obeying them.

I think they want to see an end to this government. Nothing less than that will satisfy them.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
army role in pak crisis by col sk aggarwal,retd on 15 Jan 2012

armed forces are raised and maintained by govt for political purpose that is to protect national boarders and meet the natural calamities including internal disturbances unfortunately jinnah died early and democracy could not grow strong in pakistan.army chief is part of the govt but he does not represents the govt before court of law. kiyani has exceeded his brief and challenged the authority of the lawfully elected govt- may be with tacit understanding with gen musharaf or chief justice chaudhary which is not good for people of pakistan. supreme court has its own grudge against the govt. india should not worry about the happenings there because democratic govt or dictatorship, army and isi run the show. we should take care of our boarders and handle game plan of isi. limited attack cannot be ruled out to divert attention of world powers. but whatever is happening in pakistan is not good for democracy and law abiding peace loving people of pakistan. pray for their lives.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Rahul Gandhi may now jump from stage in anger: Akhilesh Yadav

Kurta not a Hindu attire, Muslims also wear it: Malaysian PM

Ponty not forewarned, seized Rs 11 cr cash from him: Taxman

Woman bites off man's tongue who tried to rape her

Now, Saudi couples may need 'management licenses' to get married

'Bhangra' beats out an Indian immigration scam in UK

Balakrishna Pillai slaps minister's staff in public view

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map