www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShoppingTendersClassifieds OpinionsTravel Jobs Hotels
| Make this your homepage | Archive
Expressindia » Story

India bound by the 123 agreement: Pranab

Font Size

Agencies

Posted: Oct 11, 2008 at 1811 hrs IST

Washington, October 11: India made it clear on Saturday that it was bound only by the agreed text of the 123 Agreement after it inked the landmark pact to operationalise the nuclear deal with the US, culminating three years of intense efforts from both sides to reverse 34 years of its nuclear isolation.

Winding up his day-long visit here during which he signed the civilian nuclear cooperation pact with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee said he was satisfied with fuel supply assurances specified not only in the accord but also in the Presidential Statement.

"...we will implement this agreement in good faith. That clearly implies we trust each other," he told reporters responding to a query on the issue of trust in foreign policy.

Mukherjee maintained that he was aware of the internal mechanisms and processes of the US but would not comment on the process of legislation in the American Congress.

"We are bound by the agreed text of the 123 Agreement which is negotiated by the negotiators of the two countries. And it is on the basis of Joint statement issued by President (George W) Bush and Prime Minister (Manmohan Singh) on 18th July 2005 and also by the Joint Statement of March 2006. It is not merely a question of the interpretation. It is the question of the agreed text on which we are depending," the External Affairs Minister said.

When asked whether he was rejecting Congressional intent in the resolution of approval by insisting that India was bound only the text of the 123 Agreement, he said "I am aware of the procedure followed by US Congress in the legislation. Every country has its own process of legislation as we have."

"We are bound by the agreement negotiated between the two sovereign countries and in this case, it is the 123 Agreement," he said, hoping that India will be soon completing procedures on the issue of liabilities.

"As far as the question on the International Convention to mitigate the liabilities of nuclear issues, we are in the process of completing the formalities in our country and I do hope it would be possible for us to participate in the International Convention in due course of time," Mukherjee said.

On fuel supply assurances, the minister maintained that the Text of the 123 Agreement and the Presidential Statement took care of the matter.

"The text of the agreement, if you go through, has entrusted responsibilities and obligations on both sides. In my observation I have pointed out that there is a balance between the obligation and the rights which we comply with. The Text of the 123 Agreement provides the fuel supply assurance to India and it has been reiterated by the President's signing Statement," Mukherjee said.

The Minister was asked if he was satisfied with the Bush Statement on fuel assurances against the backdrop of what administration members had told Congress on the implications of any testing by India.

"...every country has its own way of internal mechanism of fulfilling the constitutional obligation and also the process of legislation. I would not like to make any comment on the process of legislation in US Congress and their observations on it. As I repeated, the Fuel supply assurance is being provided in the text of the 123 Agreement itself in Article 5.6," he said.

Pressed whether this assurance is legal or political, Mukherjee replied "I mentioned the particular section of the agreement which is signed."

Mukherjee said that there were moments when doubts had come if the accord would materialise.

"Of course in these long three years there had been many moments of suspicion. Even on this issue the Government of India had to face a No Trust motion in our Lok Sabha. And we won that trust motion. Therefore there had been occasions. Many people doubted whether the agreement will see the light of day. But ultimately it has been possible to achieve this success," Mukherjee said.

The minister did not believe that there is an adverse linkage between the current financial crisis and the civil nuclear cooperation getting off the ground. "This agreement is a culmination of three years of efforts. This agreement has been signed when all the necessary formalities have been completed including the ratification of US Congress as required per US Constitution and finally by the assent to this law by the US President," he said.

"In between certain developments have taken place. No doubt it would have its impact on the overall economic situation but this is not particularly related to the Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation which is the subject of this agreement," he said.

Mukherjee also maintained that it is not possible to put a precise dollar value to what American firms would be able to compete for nuclear trade in India.

"We are entering into civil nuclear cooperation with the United States, France and Russia and these are essentially commercial contacts and surely the commercial aspect will be taken into account. But we are aware of an expanding relationship with the USA," he said at one point.

"... these are all commercial transactions which will take place when commercial contracts take place. In terms of value, in terms of other ingredients, it is too early (to say). These are all estimates; as and when they materialise, the actual figures will be available to us," Mukherjee said.

Calling the initialling of the 123 Agreement between the two countries a "historic occasion," a beaming Mukherjee in his opening statement at the press conference said "it marks the beginning of resumption of India's civil nuclear cooperation and trade with the United States and with the wider international community."

"We intend to implement this Agreement in good faith and in accordance with the principles of international law and I am confident that the US will also do the same," he said. Earlier, speaking at the signing ceremony at the State Department, Mukherjee insisted that the accord was "legally binding" on both sides.

Noting that the Agreement reflects a "careful balance of rights and obligations", he said "its (pact's) provisions are now legally-binding on both sides once the agreement enters into force."

His comment assumes significance since the US had earlier said that the contents of the 123 Agreement were a political commitment and not legally binding, triggering concerns in India over aspects like promises on nuclear fuel assurances.

The importance of the Agreement is that it is the first step to civil nuclear cooperation and trade between India and the United States, Mukherjee said.

"The Agreement reflects a careful balance of rights and obligations for both parties," he stressed again at the press conference.

Mukherjee said India attached "great importance" to the agreement inked and to civil nuclear commerce with the international community which also paved the way for entry of US firms into the Indian nuclear market after three decades.

He also thanked Bush for his "sustained support" for the deal and described Rice as a "pillar of strength" through the process of realising the joint vision of Prime Minister Singh and the US President.

Ads by Google
Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
123 Agreement by Prabhat Sen Sarma on 11 Oct 2008

123 Agreement will help American sinking economy at the cost of Indian economy. Hyde Act can`t be superseded by the statement of PrezBush.

INDO-US NUCLEAR PACT by Rabin Mahanta on 11 Oct 2008

Agreement is good for Indo-US friendship. Leftists in India should not oppose this any more

NUKE DEAL by G. K. GHOSH on 11 Oct 2008

INDIA THUS SURRENDERS INDEPENDENCE. IT REMAIND INDEPENDENT FROM '47 TO '08.

America - India Agreement by Ameer Hamza on 11 Oct 2008

Americans are cheaters. It is conspiracy against Pakistan, Iran and China. America using Pakistani Government as a tool to crush their own people. shame to America

protect ... them by ilarum on 11 Oct 2008

Mia Hamza. Please leave this country and settle one of the above mentioned countries. Try hard to protect the said countries'identity, culture, security etc. at least personal level.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Deshmukh gone, Rane frontrunner as Cong delays successor announcement

Need for direct and tough action by Pak: Rice

'We want action now’, thousands chant across India

8 kg RDX found in CST baggage

Throw bodies of slain terrorists into sea: Muslims

Pak says 'no' to handing over Hafiz, Masood

Ex-SIMI activist opens fire at police, Hyderabad on alert

More
© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map