
| Font Size |



With Australian captain Ricky Ponting and several other players from that country deciding to opt out, Flintoff’s fragile fitness has assumed a larger than life picture, especially in the wake of England failing to win the third Test in Antigua.
In an article for the ‘Telegraph’, former England fast bowler Derek Pringle is critical of Flintoff’s desire to appear for the Chennai Super Kings in the IPL in his injured state, and urges him to learn from Ponting, who has put country first before IPL.
He quotes one England player as saying: "Ponting can do what he likes. I'm playing in IPL, end of story."
“If that sounds unpatriotic, the reality of playing for England these days is a non-stop slog of matches and tours for which the England and Wales Cricket Board must take much of the blame. After all, the quickest way to grow the game's revenue in recent years has been to enhance TV deals by playing ever-increasing amounts of cricket, a process that has proceeded unchecked for 10 years,” says Pringle.
At first players countered by warning of burnout, but with money now to be made by playing yet more cricket, a hard-nosed attitude has taken hold,” Pringle adds.
He blames the ECB squarely, saying that had they not made such an issue over IPL participation last year, and not insisted that players appear for the ill-fated Stanford venture as a way of remaining out of reach of India's Twenty20 moguls, the players would probably have been less bullish now about taking part.
“The Board's other option, and one many former England cricketers feel they should have taken, was to have handed players, especially those dithering over signing their central contracts, an ultimatum: "You can play in IPL but while it takes place when it does [April and May], if you do you won't play for England," Pringle says.
“With the Ashes imminent, injury is likely to be an emotive matter with regard to IPL, which is why Flintoff, who will discover the extent of any damage to his right hip on Saturday, is keeping his own counsel. But the thought of him playing extra cricket, and IPL is an add-on, albeit a highly lucrative one, must run contrary to England's best interests for this summer's Ashes and World Twenty20,” he concludes.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


Derek is right. Country comes first. If you are not fully fit you will not do justice and thats unethical. If Freedy is not 100% fit he should not play any cricket. If wants to play at the cost of Playing for his country, thats unethical.
Imagine if the IPL were APL (Australian) or EPL (English) instead...all these Derek Pringles and his like would have been hiding somewhere, or urging the Flintoffs of the world to go ahead and play there...am I being paranoid or do I see tinges of racism here? The old establishment of world cricket cannot tolerate a non-white country becoming the centre of the game. On top of that, they have not been able to besmirch the IPL on any substantive grounds- be it source of money, or management of the tournament. While these 'patriotic' ones conveniently ignore the mess that their own board (ECB) got their cricket into by associating with that crook Stanford! Get up and get real Pringle, cricket is now run from the sub-continent. Accept the fact and be humble about it.