
| Font Size |



"I have always maintained that Bt crops need to be scientifically evaluated," she said. "It is impossible tohave a sensible discussion on GM crops when it is hijacked to unsubstantiated emotional levels."
The biotech major Biocon Chairman said there is a regulatory path for GM crops which aims to establish safety and efficacy over an accepted period and it has been diligently followed by Bt brinjal on the basis of which the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) has given its positive verdict.
"If threats and allegations reverse this verdict, it will be a regulatory failing," she said, and expressed hope that Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh takes his decision with due respect being shown to scientific evaluation and the fact that Bt brinjal "is an option, not a mandate."
"It is up to farmers to opt or desist from cultivating Bt brinjal as in the case of Bt cotton. If there are no tangible benefits, there will be no takers for Bt brinjal. Let the farmers decide," Mazumdar-Shaw suggested.
The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee had last year given the go ahead for commercialisation of Bt brinjal but has faced staiff resistance from consumer groups and NGOs.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


Can you leave chain smoker to decide about cigarette or an alcoholic about alcohol consumption, they are no experts. Don't propagate wrong msg to people, do you know anything about farmers, their knowledge about Bt technology?
Could Ms. Shaw pls specify what research has been conducted on the long term effects of Bt Brijal on Human health as well as the ecosystem? Im not talking about effects in 1 year but over 3 generations at least. Do we have enough evidence to say that there are no ill effects?