The professors have accused the authorities of withholding important facts stated in the report. “Not only is the report abridged, but it is also unsigned, which implies that it is not original,” said a professor. They said instead of having a hard look at some of the shortcomings pointed out by the report, university authorities were busy in projecting themselves as achievers.

“The circulated report is just a computer print-out on plain paper and does not bear any authority’s signature. It only bears laudatory comments of the accrediting body about the university,” said another professor of the university . He said the fact that the circulated copies were unsigned, raised doubts about the authenticity of the report. “Authentic reports and documents are always signed,” he said

“We have failed to understand why the university authorities have circulated an abridged and unsigned report,” said another professor. “While its nice to know about the good comments given by NAAC on the university’s performance, the teachers also need to know the suggestions of the accreditation authority to help improve the academic standards further. But the report circulated among the teaching fraternity hardly has anything of this sort,” he said.