- Weather | Horoscope | Stocks
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShoppingTendersClassifieds OpinionsTravel Career
| Make this your homepage | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Obama, Clinton clash in heated debate

Font Size -

Reuters

Posted online: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 09:36:47


Cleveland, February 27: Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton clashed sharply in a high-stakes one-on-one debate on Tuesday, accusing each other of falsely portraying their stances on health care, trade and other issues.

Clinton, who needs to win next week in Ohio and Texas to keep her presidential campaign alive after Obama's streak of 11 straight victories in nominating contests, went on the attack early in the debate at Cleveland State University in Ohio.

Obama fired back repeatedly in a series of sometimes heated but controlled exchanges. The debate, the last before next Tuesday's contests, was sharper in tone than last week's encounter in Texas, but far less personal and angry than a debate last month in South Carolina.

Clinton kept up her recent criticism of Obama campaign literature sent to Ohio voters that she said mischaracterized her health care proposal, which includes mandates requiring Americans to purchase health insurance.

"We should have a good debate that uses accurate information, not false, misleading and discredited information, especially on something as important as whether or not we will achieve quality, affordable health care for everyone," the New York senator said.

Obama, an Illinois senator, said Clinton has frequently misrepresented his health care plan, which does not include mandates and which some critics suggest could leave 15 million Americans uninsured.

Obama said he was interested in bringing the cost of health care down and making coverage more affordable and enforcing mandates could create a burden on some low-income Americans. Clinton's criticisms, he said, were part of a consistent pattern.

"Senator Clinton has ... constantly sent out negative attacks on us, e-mail, robo-calls, flyers, television ads, radio calls, and we haven't whined about it because I understand that's the nature of these campaigns," he said.

"But to suggest somehow that our mailing is somehow different from the kinds of approaches that Senator Clinton has taken throughout this campaign I think is simply not accurate."

AGGRESSIVE CLINTON

With her campaign on the line, Clinton has aggressively attacked Obama in the last few days, questioning his readiness to become commander in chief and chiding him for the health care campaign literature sent to Ohio voters.

Clinton, once the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination for the November election, has lost once strong polling leads in Ohio and Texas as Obama has gained momentum and made inroads among her supporters.

In the debate, she attacked Obama for claiming she supported the North American Free Trade Agreement, which she said she believes should be renegotiated. She was first lady when her husband, President Bill Clinton, approved the deal.

The trade agreement is unpopular in Ohio, where it has been blamed for contributing to a broad loss of manufacturing jobs in the state.

"You know, I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning. I didn't have a public position on it because I was part of the administration. But when I started running for the Senate, I have been a critic," Clinton said.

But Obama repeated the charge and said he would push to have NAFTA redone.

"I think that it is inaccurate for Senator Clinton to say that she's always opposed NAFTA. In her campaign for Senate, she said that NAFTA, on balance, had been good for New York and good for America," he said.

Clinton complained about having to take the first question more often than Obama, and made reference to her campaign's charges that he gets an easier ride from the national media than she does.

She pointed to a television skit that portrayed a fawning press posing questions to Obama.

"If anybody saw Saturday Night Live, you know, maybe we should ask Barack if he's comfortable and needs another pillow," she said. "I just find it kind of curious that I keep getting the first question on all of these issues, but I'm happy to answer it."

The two contenders revisited their differences on the Iraq war. Clinton said Obama, an early opponent of the war, had the advantage of not being in the Senate in 2002 when she voted to authorize the war.

"He didn't have responsibility, he didn't have to vote," she said.

But Obama said the vote cast doubt on Clinton's judgment, and she "facilitated and enabled" President George W. Bush's decision to go to war.

"Senator Clinton often says that she is ready on Day One, but in fact she was ready to give into George Bush on this critical issue," he said.

Rate this Article
5
Rating
Bookmark this Page
Ads by Google
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
No chance for Democrats---- by romesh.sharma on 27 Feb 2008

Democrats had lost the elections the very day when Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama were given the tickets for Presidential candidacy.The truth is simple that USAmericans are still not fully of the mind to have a woman or a Black Prez.Now that both of them are losing the mastery of will over thoughts and are finding faults with each other the chances of winning actual election have diminished to zero.On the other hand H.Clinton will have better chances to compete against McCain because of the fact that its not only Obama's skin colour but his ethnic and religious complicities.Obama might have been converted to christianity but most people still see him as born muslim and that his early upbringing was Islamic.To authenticate his belief people can't to his words because what is deep inside his mind nobody will know it.Its said his father was atheist which is not true.Moreover his mother who herself was converted to Islam by marrying another Indonesian man who was muslim couldn't have sent him to other school than Islamic one.Though this doesn't disturb me if he becomes Prez of the USA but I guess/feel that it will too bad for the greatest power to elect a prez who has to still prove his worth of being truthful which needs couple of generations atleast.

Comment by S M Shetty on 27 Feb 2008

Shadow boxing will most likely be a downside for both as it exhibits their narrow mindedness.They would do well if they address themselves to pertinently broader issues on the state of the nation , wordly order, American interest and their plans of action should they win .

© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map