
| Font Size |



Samir Abu Hamza made the contentious comments in Sydney during a lecture in 2003, but they were first reported Thursday after they appeared in a video posted on the Internet.
During the lecture on marriage delivered to a male audience, Hamza - who has previously had no national profile – ridiculed Australian law that regards forced sex within marriage as rape.
"Amazing, how can a person rape his wife?" Hamza said, adding that wives must immediately respond to their husbands' sexual demands.
He also said a man was entitled to use limited force as a last resort to punish a disobedient wife. "After you have advised them for a long, long time, then you smack them, you beat them and - please brothers, calm down – the beating that the Muhammad showed is like the toothbrush that you use to brush your teeth."
"You are not allowed to bruise them; you are not allowed to make them bleed," Hamza said. "You don't go and grab a broomstick and say that is what Allah has said."
Hamza could not be contacted for comment Thursday at the Islamic centre he runs in the southern city of Melbourne. Thursday's edition of the Herald Sun newspaper quoted Hamza as saying he stood by his recorded comments.
While Australia is a relatively tolerant and multicultural society, ethnic and religious rifts occasionally flare, with the treatment of women under Islam a flashpoint in this majority-Christian nation.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd condemned Hamza's comments, saying violence toward women was permissible "under no circumstances." "Australia will not tolerate these sort of remarks," Rudd told reporters. "They don't belong in modern Australia, and he should stand up, repudiate them, and apologize."
Joumanah El Matrah, the executive of the Islamic Women's Welfare Council of Victoria state, said Hazma's comments were "a grossly inappropriate representation of both the Quran and Muslim views on violence, both in wife beating and rape."
"I don't like to use the word extremism, but certainly his views are outdated and a minority view that is insistent on seeing women as less human than men," she said.
Sherene Hassan, the vice president of the Islamic Council of Victoria, said research has found that some imams in Australia share Hamza's stance on domestic violence. She said the council will hold a series of workshops aimed at changing those views.
Conflicts between mainstream Australia and its fast-growing Muslim minority, who number 400,000 in a population of 21 million, have gained a higher profile in recent years.
Australia's former mufti, Sheik Taj Aldin al-Hilali, created a furore in 2006 which split the Islamic community with a lecture in Sydney in which he compared women who do not wear head scarves to "uncovered meat" and said immodestly dressed women invite rape.
Tensions between Muslim and non-Muslim youths erupted into days of rioting at Sydney's Cronulla beach in late 2005.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


The biggest problem in this world is not being able to differentiate between" Religion"
The biggest problem with any religion is it does NOT change with time. Time brings about changes in perceptions, values, views etc. becauase of changes in economic,political, social, moral and other aspects of life. Like constitution of a country there must be REVISION of guidelines periodically. Only then any religious teaching remains relevant and valid.
God is eternal.All living entities are His part and parcel.The living entities too are eternal.Religion means the worship of God by all living entities.So how can this be changed?!
all religion should have the same rights and should follow the same law.
There is a point in what is said.What is marriage it is a understanding between a wife and a husband. Love is a consideration, but a woman is not getting married just to let the man watch her. She has equal right to demand sex as the man. A man demanding sex from his woman is not wrong she has no right to refuse it and if refused a man can force sex. It would be morally better than approaching other women which the woman should understand.
In the muslim communities it is the mullahs and muftis who do all the thinking although they are of medivial mind set.Most followers do not even know to read on their own and simply follow the leaders like a flock of sheep.Even for wild human varieties like Taliban they will find enough followers in India.Every one is trying to rule in the name of GOd.It is believed by them that women have no entry in heaven. So they are treated like animals here on earth.Every time we hear someone come in defence of the holy book when such fatwas are out. Nobody is sure of what is written .
Followers of Islam have no right to criticise others in this regard as Islam does not give any right to its woman followers and they live like second class followers of the faith.It is only Islam that mandates wearing the veil, which is itself a violation of human rights of a woman.WHY DO WE ALLOW SOMEONE LIKE HAMZA TO TALK ON ISSUES LIKE THESE? WE ALL DISAGREE WITH WHAT SUCH OPINION, BUT WILL Mr. HAMZA TELL US WHAT IS HIS OPINION ABOUT MUSLIM WOMEN WEARING THE VEIL?
Please kick such people out of the civilised country and let them preach what they in their own country or Muslim country.
What is regrettable is that there are many followers of this looney Samir Abu Hamza and their miliray and fighing arm is Al Qaeda and the likes. I am sure that in India he does not have much following and we must do all we can to ensure that this remains so.