The glitches, and the authority’s defiance of the SIC’s orders, were pointed out by Commodore (Retd) L.K. Batra, an RTI and social activist. He has sought compensation for appellants.

Batra had pointed out to SIC Gyanendra Sharma that the Noida website had listed RTI provisions wrongly. Also, instead of appointing a Public Information Officer (PIO) to handle queries from citizens, it was making do with an Assistant Public Information Officer (APIO).

Batra also brought to the SIC’s attention that the APIO, although authorised by law only to receive appeals and forward them to the PIO, was handling the entire procedure. He was even providing explanations on queries, which only the authority’s Chief Executive Officer is allowed by law to do. Of the wrong information put up on the site, Batra says, “There’s a line that says information can be withheld if the authority thinks it is an official secret. Actually, the list of information that can be withheld is listed in the RTI Act — the authority cannot decide on its own what information to give out or withhold.”

The RTI activist is seeking action against the Noida authority because, close to a year after the SIC passed orders on these discrepancies, corrective action was not taken. He says this amounts to contempt of the SIC. When contacted a Noida official said, “The website has now been updated. We are preparing to give our formal reply at the next hearing in Lucknow.”

In its earlier reply to the SIC, the authority had blamed the systems manager for not carrying out changes on the website. The SIC has summoned the systems manager on January 4.