www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShopping TendersClassifieds Opinions Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Raj HC stops shooting of Salman's film at Amer Fort

Font Size

Agencies

Posted: Feb 13, 2009 at 1259 hrs IST
Veer

Jaipur Shooting of Salman Khan' film 'Veer' at historic Amer Fort here will be discontinued with the Rajasthan High Court today ordering the film unit to pack up its bags from the protected monuments where a wall collapsed during filming yesterday.

While ordering the film unit to stop shooting, a Division Bench comprising Justice Ashok Parihar and Justice G S Sarraf also issued a notice to the state government to explain why strict norms related to "protected" historical monuments were not followed in the case.

"Money and greed, coupled with power create blindness, madness and the person becomes totally insane and insensitive.

When the Government and public authorities indulge in such practice, a great havoc is created resulting in chaos all around. The episode and mishap happened in Amer Palace, Jaipur yesterday is a glaring example of the same," the court said.

Besides, Bollywood star Salman Khan the film also features state tourism minister Bina Kak.

The court took a strong view on yesterday's incident in which at least 15 onlookers, including two cameramen, were injured when a portion of wall at the historic Amer Fort collapsed during shooting of the film.

It also sought a detailed report with regard to giving permission for constructing a huge set and film shooting in the complex even though there is restriction on photography and video shooting for the tourists there.

"The entire original land-scape of the main courtyard at the entrance of Amer Fort, Palace and Temple have been destroyed. The trees, fountains, flower beds covered by carved stone Jalees have been razed to the ground, may be, to allow the construction of huge sets for film shootings as in the present case," the court said.

The court also asked the authorities to explain why adequate compensation may not be recovered not only from the erring officers but from the film producer for the damage to the public property and injuries caused to onlookers.

The court also noted, the very basic structure and original grandeur have been "massively" tampered with under the pretext of development where huge funds are pocketed by a few persons who do not even have a basic knowledge of history and architecture.

"Unfortunately, not only the public but especially the concerned authorities have become blind, deaf and dumb in the glitter of money. In recent past, historical protected monuments have become commercial source of income," it said.

The shooting of 'Veer', produced by Vijay Gailani and directed by Anil Sharma, at the Fort, 20 km from here was earlier mired in controversy with one Rajendra Singh challenging it on the grounds that it was violative of the Monument Protection Act.

The Fort Authority had later cleared the decks on an assurance from filmmakers that assured them of taking precautions.

"The authorities not even have anticipated and visualized the unforeseen accidents and mishaps at such places of great importance while giving permission for not only constructing a huge set but shooting a commercial film with so-called famous stars which has ultimately resulted in not only large-scale damages to the building but serious injuries to large number of people," the court said.

The Amer Fort is a protected monument which attracts tourists from across the world. There is also a famous Sheetla Mata temple in the complex.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
personal opinion by Dr B.L.Khandelwal on 18 Feb 2009

Remarkably expressed views on matters of protection

veer by tarik on 13 Feb 2009

The first reports said that it was an "artificial wall" that collapsed, leading me to think it was part of the set. Now people are saying it was an "ancient" wall. I can't rely on the accuracy of Indian media's reports, especially when it comes to Salman, so now I don't know if it was really part of the original Fort that was damaged. I still doubt it, though, because those original walls were built to withstand an onslaught of thousands of enemy troops (and did withstand them!) so I doubt that they would collapse merely because some people climbed over or stood on them. It seems, from all reports, it wasn't the wall's collapse, but the ensuing stampede, in which these people got injured. In any case, I get the strong feelling that there were many groups who were just looking for any excuse to stop the filming, so this gave them a golden opportunity. I was actually something to be made out of it, so this court order doesn't come as a surprise, unfortunately.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Pak anti-terror court declares Lakhvi as 26/11 mastermind

India-US sign six MoUs on counter-terrorism

Reveal files on the appointment of judges: CIC to SC

RR Patil refused to step out during 26/11: Bhujbal

ATR report an attempt to hush up Ayodhya issue: Maya

India indispensable to future we want to build: Obama

Time not right for pulling out Army: Omar

More
Featured Services
© 2009 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map