www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShopping TendersClassifieds Opinions Jobs Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

SC to Tata Motors: reply in 2 weeks

Font Size

Express news service

Posted: Apr 16, 2008 at 0116 hrs IST

New Delhi, April 15 Accepting the plea of Tata Motors to implead it in a dispute over its small car factory in Singur, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the car maker to file its reply within two weeks on a petition challenging a judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which allowed it to proceed with its ambitious project.

Issuing a directive in this regard, a Bench of Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justice R V Raveendran posted the matter for further hearing on May 13. Fali S Nariman, senior advocate, appearing for Tata Motors, urged the court not to take up the matter and pass any directions without hearing its plea. “The company has already incurred an expenditure of Rs 700 crore on the project,” stated the application for impleadment filed last week.

The company on January 10 had unveiled its 623-cc Nano, the country's cheapest car, which it proposes to sell from later this year for as low as Rs one lakh.

The appeal filed by advocate Kedar Nath Yadav challenging the ruling of the Calcutta High Court was filed in the second week of April. According to him, “most of the Singur land is used for agricultural purposes and is key to the livelihood of farmers.”

“There are also some dwellings on the land, but due to the highly arbitrary actions of the West Bengal Government, the land has been acquired in the name of public purpose without any specific plan to rehabilitate the farmers and their families,” the petitioner had contended.

The Calcutta High Court had on January 18 upheld the validity of the acquisition of 997.11 acres of land at Singur for the project, while dismissing a batch of petitions, including that of Yadav, which had challenged land acquisition for the said project. The land acquisition was illegal as it didn't adhere to the relevant provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and other rules, said Yadav's advocate Santi Ranjan Das.

The appellant has sought quashing of the state Government notification on the land acquisition.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

SC notice to Centre on Delhi HC verdict on gay sex

China objected to ADB funds for Arunachal: Krishna to RS

Top guns to sit on AI advisory board

We know talks are important, but end violence first: India to Pak

CBI waiting in the wings as CID investigates Ranbir's 'murder'

Varun security issue: Sushma not happy with PC's briefing

Hooch Tragedy: Death toll climbs to 86, bootleggers detained

More
© 2009 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map