www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

SGPC might re-install Dwyer’s portrait in museum

Font Size

Dharmendra Rataul

Posted: Dec 26, 2007 at 0000 hrs IST

Amritsar, December 25 The controversial decision of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee to remove the portrait of Michael O. Dwyer, who was killed by Shaheed Udham Singh in London for abetting the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, might be reverted. The religious body is seriously contemplating to re-install the portrait following resentment by various Sikh intellectuals and leaders over the “hurried decision” to remove the picture from Golden Temple’s Sikh Museum.

SGPC chief Avtar Singh Makkar, who had constituted a three-member team to look into the matter, said various anomalies in installation of Dwyer’s portrait in the museum have come to light. “The introduction written along with the picture was misleading and even defamatory. No one ever objected to it. It was written that Dwyer was murdered by one Udham Singh and there is no mention who Dwyer was and for what reasons he was shot dead,” said Makkar, adding that they would re-install the portrait and correct the discrepancies.

“Now the proper phrases would be used and visitors to the Museum would be fully informed about Dwyer’s involvement in the 1919 massacre that shook the conscience of India and gave a new lead to the freedom struggle,” he said. He said the SGPC was discussing the matter at the highest level and Dwyer’s and Udham Singh’s pictures would be placed side by side and while the Dwyer would be rightfully posed as villain, Singh would be eulogised for his role of taking revenge on Dwyer.

It is to be noted that Dwyer was Lt General of Punjab when the Jallianwala Bagh massacre took place on April 13, 1919. Brigadier General Reginald Edward Harry Dyer, who is often confused with Dwyer, had actually ordered the killing. Dwyer had justified the killing and he was shot dead at Caxton Hall in London on March 13, 1940, 21 years after the massacre.

“If installed, proper care would be taken that the real history behind the ugly chapter is put forward,” said Makkar, adding that he was not against installing a picture of Shaheed Bhagat Singh as well in the Museum.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Angry Rushdie claims Rajasthan police 'invented' plot to keep him away

Age row: Former Army chief backs Gen V K Singh

One Indian killed, 6 injured in deadly Nigerian attacks

Congress backs Rahul, BJP distrusts Varun: book

DoT asks Tata for Idea shareholding data

FICCI fears reaction post-Vodafone verdict

Olympics: 2012 mascots in China 'sweat shop' row

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map