
| Font Size |



In the run-up to the federal rescue plan that guaranteed 306 billion dollars of toxic assets of Citi and multi-billion dollar capital infusion in lieu of shares, media was rife with the reports that Pandit was on the verge of losing his job as he had failed to deliver on the mandate to revive the bank.
A day after the mega rescue plan, it has now come out that the authorities discussed whether to replace Pandit as Citi CEO, but there was a disagreement over the issue.
A report from the US business daily ‘Wall Street Journal’, which has said that the name of American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault had emerged as a possible replacement, said that the federal officials had a disagreement on whether Pandit was at fault for the company's problems, while debating the structure of the rescue plan for Citigroup.
Separately, British daily the ‘Financial Times’ reported that the US regulators during their talks have decided against Pandit's replacement as they could not find an obvious successor for him.
The report quoted a participant from the discussions as saying that, "if there was an obvious choice for a replacement for the chief executive officer, that would have levered up the benefit of the package but there was no obvious queue of candidates."
Over the past week, media was agog with reports that Pandit was set to lose his job within a year of assuming the office, as he had lost the mandate for steering Citi out of its financial mess.
Further the WSJ report stated that, Pandit may not be in an immediate danger of losing his job as the government did not push for his ouster as part of the agreement, as it did with the CEO of American International Group when it bailed out that company.
Till a few weeks ago, Citi was being considered among the last ones standing in the world's biggest economic crisis in the recent times and Pandit was even being commended for successfully turning around the bank.
But a sharp plunge in its share price over the past week to below four dollars, which wiped off more than half of the company's valuation, re-ignited the concerns about the bank's financial health and reports started surfacing that the board and investors wanted Pandit out of his corner room.
A number of media reports suggested that Pandit was looking at selling the entire bank, or dis-assemble it into pieces to be sold out separately, in his efforts to revive the once-most-valued financial institutions of the world.
However, the state-sponsored bailout of the battered Citigroup has not only dispelled the doubts about the very existence of the financial services giant but also put to rest questions on the continuation of its India-born chief Vikram Pandit.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


It is more like 53,000 if I remember correctly. But the fact is, the one's who created the problem (namely his predissors and wall street wizords) will not be loosing any sleep over this global meltdown since they have they millions in the safer banks.
Israeli's controlled US Banking because I refuse to call any one American who can serve in the Army of a foreign country/Israel like Rahm Emanuel and can vote in the Election of a Foreign Country/Israel.Vikram Pundit who took over CITI when it was in Gutter got $38 million Bonus in a pact he will keep quiet how and who stole Billions from CITI. US Govt run by Israelis like Henry Paulson were looking for a sacrificial lamb and Vikram Pundit volunteered to be that lamb. He will stay on because the new govt is also controlled by Israelis
WHEN HE WAS HIRED FEW MONTHS BACK, IT WAS SAID THAT HE WAS THE LOWEST PAID CEO. AND NOW IN THIS BAD SITUATION OF THE INSTITUTION, WHO WOULD WANT TO JOIN THE PLACE? HE WILL EVENTUALLY BE FIRED BECAUSE HIS POOR PERFORMENCE. A CEO CAN NOT BLAME ANY POLITICAL/FINANCIAL SITUATION FOR COMPANY'S FILURE IN USA. WHEN YOU ARE PAID SO MUCH YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO FORCAST THE FUTURE AND PLAN ACCORDINGLY. WELL, BECAUSE OF HIS PERFORMANCE, 12000 ORDINARY PEOPLE LOST THEIR JOBS FROM CITIBANK RECENTLY. HE DESERVES THE SAME.
Dear RamKrishna,He was given the job to clean up the mess that that was made over a period of several years. All he could predict was an immenent doom. If I remeber correctly he still saved the company millions by restructuring. Jobs were lost in an effort to keep Citi afloat. If you can not understand even this, you are dumb, and did not deserve to haev the citi job in the first place.