- Weather | Horoscope | Stocks
expressindia web
HomeBlogsCricketAstrologyShoppingTendersClassifieds OpinionsTravel
| Make this your homepage | Archive
Expressindia » Story

'V S Naipaul kept a mistress for almost 24 years’

Font Size -

Agencies

Posted online: Friday , March 21, 2008 at 12:17:03
Updated: Friday , March 21, 2008 at 12:39:21


London, March 21: Nobel laureate Sir V S Naipaul tormented his first wife for nearly four decades, regularly visited brothels in London and kept a mistress for almost 24 years before suddenly leaving her to marry a Pakistani scribe, according to his biography.

The 75-year-old novelist, born to Indian parents in Trinidad and has been living in Britain since winning a place in Oxford, has admitted in his biography that he frequently humiliated his first wife (Patricia) and even refused to gift her a wedding ring.

Naipaul often abandoned her to go travelling with Mrs Gooding, the married Anglo-Argentine with whom he fell in love in 1972, and would often tell his wife how he was missing his mistress but then say that he needed Lady Patricia to help him with his books, it has been revealed.

"I was liberated. She (Patricia) was destroyed. It was inevitable," the Nobel laurate said.

The book, penned by Patrick French who was given free access to all of Naipaul's papers, claims that the novelist started visiting prostitutes when the couple were living in London three years after they married.

"In the summer of 1958, turning imagination into reality, he (Naipaul) started to have sex with prostitutes. He would find their telephone numbers in local newspapers and visit them in the afternoon in secret while Pat was at work as a school teacher," The Daily Telegraph reported on Friday, quoting the biography.

Naipaul, according to the book, has admitted that his mental cruelty towards his wife, who was suffering from cancer, may have killed her. "She suffered. It could be said that I killed her. It could be said. I feel a little bit that way," he said.

Bookmark this Page
  • Digg

    On Digg, users share intersting online content by submitting links to the site. At that point, the Digg audience can vote on whether or not they think it is interesting. Articles with lots of votes, or "diggs," rise up higher on the site's main page and topical subsection pages. Another form of social sharing, this site also lets users categorize the content they are submitting to Digg and label it with descriptions of up to 350 characters. Digg users can also submit comments on each content item submitted to the site.

    To register, go to: http://digg.com/register

    del.icio.us

    At its most basic level, del.icio.us allows users to save their bookmarks online. Del.icio.us also gives users the ability to "tag" their bookmarks with descriptive category names. For example, someone who has bookmarked multiple Web pages that deal with the Washington Nationals baseball team could tag those links with any terms they want, like "baseball," "nationals," "natsfan," etc.

    As members of a "social bookmarking" community, del.icio.us sers can also see how many other people have bookmarked the same pages, and they can look at those users' bookmark collections to find other interesting online content.

    To register, go to: http://del.icio.us/register

    Reddit

    Reddit allows users to submit news articles and other online content to the site. Users also give articles a thumbs-up or thumbs-down. Reddit then uses those votes to build a user profile and to find articles to recommend to you. Users can also submit comments on items posted to the site.

    To register, go to: http://reddit.com/login

Rate this Article
3
Rating
Ads by Google
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
Bad but good too by Abhra on 24 May 2008

Everybody has a right to choose their lives as they want. If someone feel guilty for his or her wrong steps, we should not remerber it.

Heritage by samra on 27 Mar 2008

Being a young female Guyanese by birth raised in Trinidad from East Indian ancestry. Im am not suprise by his lifestyle but the fact that he tells the whole world of his about vices is something that an ordinary person would not want to tell the whole world about his bad deeds. But I wish he can return to his birth place Trinidad and live his remaining years besides it was Trinidad's Schools taught him the English language not England and not India. He should stop considering himself to be 'a man with no side' and start living for the future East Indian generation in Trinidad and the rest of Caribbean to appreciate his work in the field of literature.

to "Indian" by vishal on 24 Mar 2008

Indian - you have always been a moron and your current comment just underscore your obtuse thinking. What is your point ? Sure there are indian who visit brothels and who cheat on their wives and who torment their spouses. And those indians who do this are not winning nobel prizes and writing holier than thou books like "A wounded civilization". The moral depravity, cruelty and lack of remorse of this beast makes him unfit to analyze comment or judge anybody else. No matter how sound his judgement, analysis or view might be. He just has no moral locus standii to say anything to anyone about anything. If he has any shame left he should just retire from public life and go live his ignominable life in some secluded corner of the world contemplating his wrongs.

Sad but Natural... by Satish on 24 Mar 2008

As sad as the truth about Naipaul sounds, His mistakes are but a by product of a morality not based on unshakable truths. We often know what we must not do but not always do we know why? This story depicts the outcome of such a mind. When you truly understand why something is wrong it give you the strength to do the right thing.

Gutter Worm by Akram on 23 Mar 2008

This chauvinist pig is not a true indian.....

Jesus Saves by Online Swamy on 23 Mar 2008

Today is easter, the day Jesus Christ Resurrected from the dead. His Crucification was for your sins and Resurrection was your salvation, Today be saved by accepting Jesus sacrifice for your sins and His Resurrections for your salvation, say Come! Lord Jesus in my life. amen

VS Naipaul's Dirty Linen by Dr. Satish Kumar Shukla on 23 Mar 2008

I once bought of copy of WOUNDED CIVILIZATION, found nothing of substance in its pages, threw it away vowing never ever to read this writer again. Now comes his bullshit out! So I wasn't wrong after all. Dirty minds can not write ennobling literature; how can they ever? And Nobel Prize in these come down times is no guarantee either that literature in question is good.

? by jorjee on 23 Mar 2008

So why is this a frontpage news article on IndianExpress.com ?

shame unto the indian mind by sripathi on 22 Mar 2008

A writer is a spokesman of the society he represents. He should be morally sound and upright. Naipaul has brought shame to the Indian mind and the literary tradition of Tagore and Smt.Sarojini Naidu who were icons of morality

naipaul by jks on 23 Mar 2008

Naipaul as never considered himself an indian. He is a smart british ass

B TRUTHFUL by indian on 22 Mar 2008

HOW MANY INDIANS HAVE NOT GONE TO PROSTITUTE IN THEIR LIFE TIME ?HOW MANY ARE NOT HAVING A MISTRESS?HOW MANY EDUCATED INDIANS ARE NOT TORTURING WIFE?B TRUTHFUL

To "Indian" by vishal on 24 Mar 2008

Indian - you have always been a moron and your current comment just underscore your obtuse thinking. What is your point ? Sure there are indian who visit brothels and who cheat on their wives and who torment their spouses. And those indians who do this are not winning nobel prizes and writing holier than thou books like "A wounded civilization". The moral depravity, cruelty and lack of remorse of this beast makes him unfit to analyze comment or judge anybody else. No matter how sound his judgement, analysis or view might be. He just has no moral locus standii to say anything to anyone about anything. If he has any shame left he should just retire from public life and go live his ignominable life in some secluded corner of the world contemplating his wrongs.

INDIAN HYPOCRECY by indian on 22 Mar 2008

NAIPAUL IS A MODEL TO PRESENT DAY GENERATION.HE IS TRUTHFUL.HE IS NOT A HYPOCRITE LIKE MOST LOW DEGENERATED INDIANS.STOP UR HYPO CRITIC COMMENTS.

naipaul by Ashutosh Kaul on 22 Mar 2008

Naipaul is a fascinating author. Personally I believe in his work. Although I rate his travel based work higher than his novels. I fail to understand how his personal life is of any significance. A biography by its definition should be a true account of a life. More so when the subject himself is cooperating. Naipaul has never positioned himself as a role model; so he has not been monogamous! How many of us have lead a completely blameless

NAIPAUL by Chris on 22 Mar 2008

What the hell is happening over here now. NAIPAUL please return your goodies to the entire community. You are not a gentle persons by any standards.

'V S Naipaul kept a mistress for almost 24 years’ by Jay on 22 Mar 2008

He is trash person. This is an attempt to earn few more bucks, all the life he wrote stupid things about India. When he was in India (in 2002 or 2003), hypocrite English media (NDTV, Tahelka) presented him as a great icon and great Indian. But now truth is in front of world. This also reflects credibility of these channels.

NAIPAUL by REKHA SHARMA on 22 Mar 2008

WHAT A DISGUSTING MAN . HYPOCRITE PEICE OF SHIT .

V.S by SEAGOVAC on 22 Mar 2008

OH . V.S UR QUEST FOR NEWS AT LAST . IT MUST MAKE U HAPPY THAT UR GRAMMETICLLY WORKS R HORRNDUS IN NATUERE. TO BE SUPER SYCOPHANT IS WHAT U NEEDED AND HAVE BECOME . U LICK VAJPAI AND BRITS AND INSULT UR VILLAGE MATES . FOR FACT THOSE BAHIYAS WERE SENT LIKE U TO W.I BY THUGS FM ENLAND THAT RAPED UR COUNTRY . DURAM ALOR OF THIEFS READ HIS DOCUMENTS ... CORRECT UR SELF WHAT IS ILLUSION IS NEVER TRUE AND U R LIVING AN ILLUSON A SICK ONE THAT U R GOOD AS POMMIES WHO R BASICALLY THIEFS AND THUGS . KNOW CLIVE AND KNOW UR GRAND FATHER THINK WHO IS BETTER .. IT WILL SUFFICE .

NAIPAUL by SAGOLINEFOSTER on 22 Mar 2008

v.s naipaul was and is disgrace to mankind. he is establishment writer whose main aim is to polish and be awarded . infaCT HE IS AND INDIAN BHAIYA WITH A LUST TO LOOK GOOD WHILE BEING BAD AS HIS COLNIAL MASTERS. INDIAN P,M VAJPAI GAVE HIM UNDUE IMPOTANCE AND HIS MASTERS UPGRADED HIM . NOBLE PRIZE IS USUALLY GIVEN TO OST IGNOBLE PEOPLE BY SWEDEN WHO R VIKINGS AND FOREFATHERS OF BRITS.V.S WILL DO GOOD TO LOOK AT HIS CONCIENCE AND CORRECT HIMSELF IN HIS LAST DAYS . HE MUST APPOLGISE TO HINDUS , MUSLIMS , XIANS AND ENTIRE MANKIND FOR BEING SO INSULTING TO GRAB A FEW BUCKS .

NAIPAUL - The pervert by Nisha on 22 Mar 2008

I had an idea about Naipaul. It is an insult for Noble Prize institution. However, I bet his book will earn lot of money and that is what he cares. The guy is sick.

Naipul by Sumer Khan on 22 Mar 2008

How can a learned man do this. His activities exposes the fact that, until now whatever this maniac said and practised was a big lie and whoever beleived in him committed a big blunder...

Naipul by Mohammed Sameer on 22 Mar 2008

Naipul mother’s womb will be filled of shame for delivering such a male-chauvinistic. I am very astonished as to how an institution like Nobel Prize committee can select such a person for award. Will Her Majesty be happy a lunatic as her knights…He should be stripped of all awards and be sentenced to an isolated place to prevent the human race from getting polluted…

VS Naipal's auto by Murali nambi on 22 Mar 2008

crazy bastard

Surprized and Suppressed Histories by Dr BR Natarajan on 22 Mar 2008

"for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories" Naipaul got his Literature Nobel. Possible that the Nobel committee in 2001 treated cruelty to his wife as a part of suppressed history. In futute, biodata verification and credentials accreditation may be added criteria for awarding the coveted prize. Naipaul's conscience should have spoken long back and not at the time of release his biography. Revealing this now has much more than repenting. May the soul of Patricia rest in peace as she did not know that her husband rather tormentor Naipaul would get a Nobel.

Noble Naipaul by K Suresh on 22 Mar 2008

Intellectual shamelessness.Noble prize for a pervert.Anything goes in the west.His book may rake in lots of money.It is better to be a happy begger than being Noble Naipaul.

Moralists by ashutosh mishra on 21 Mar 2008

Leave personal issues to the persons involved, if you think there is sin involved here, just don't try that yourself. Right now, of course, the chances are that you may catch HIV-AIDS.Beware, it wasn't then in Naipaul's day of prostitute visitations.Thanks.

Naipaul by Paul Khanna on 21 Mar 2008

What a #%@*ing cruel man! Don't the Nobel Prize selectors check the background of nominees?

We’ll get support from 'unexpected quarters'...Prove allegations or apologise, Lalu tells B...No question of PM resigning before trust vot...PMO 'patent promoter' of horse-trading: BJPIED blast: Nine Army personnel killed in J&K'Pak's non-governance may end honeymoon in J...
© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
The Indian Express Group | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Work With Us | Site Map