
| Font Size |



The expose, published by 'The Hindu', drew immediate strong reaction from ruling Congress which asked BJP to apply to itself the same standards it adopted for the government when it was needlessly disrupting Parliament for the last few days.
The BJP, however, denied there was any doublespeak and maintained that because of its strong position, the government had to come with 16 amendments to the Civil Nuclear Liability Bill.
Seshadri Chari, BJP National Executive member and RSS pointsman in the party figured in the diplomatic cables as having told an US embassy official in Delhi in December 2005 "not to read too much into the foreign policy resolution especially the parts relating to the US", which had attacked the UPA's "subservience" to Washington.
"Chari dismissed the statement (resolution) as standard practice aimed at scoring easy political points against the UPA. BJP spokesman Prakash Javadekar echoed these statements, saying that the BJP was not really upset about the US-India relationship, but merely wanted the Government of India and US government to be more forthcoming about any deal on nuclear policy," the cable said.
In another cable, the embassy's then Charge d'affaires Peter Burleigh wrote after a meeting with L K Advani in May 2009, just before the Lok Sabha poll results were out, the BJP veteran "downplayed" any move by his party to reopen the nuclear deal noting that BJP "does not take international agreements lightly".
Advani acknowledged that the BJP's public position in July 2008 was that the deal constrained the country's strategic autonomy and that the party would re-examine if it returned to power but connected that stance to "domestic political developments" then at play in India.
The BJP leader, the diplomat wrote, was clear that there would be "no imminent BJP move to reopen the (nuclear) deal. In his view, the government is a continuity, particularly in matters of foreign policy and international agreements cannot be taken lightly."
Asked about the diplomatic cables quoting him, Chari declined to comment saying he has not seen the report. He said he did not remember if he had talked to Deputy Chief of Mission Robert Blake in December 2005.
"I don't remember the name. I don't remember the names. I don't remember whom I met in 2005," Chari said, adding the party will officially comment if required.
Javadekar said there are "no contradictions" in their
stand. "We have made our position clear both in the Lok Sabha
and Rajya Sabha and through are press statements that we
value strategic relations with the US and that all sources of
energy should be tapped," he said.
But, he said, when the government brought the Nuclear Liability Bill, the party raised certain objections and the government had to make 16 amendments to the Bill at its insistence. "We keep national interest foremost... there is no double speak," Javadekar said.
But Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari would not buy the BJP's defence. He said, "for the BJP, chickens have come home to roost and they have come rather soon."
He said BJP had made Wikileaks "the Holy Grail of their political philosophy" even when Congress had warned them not to give credence to hearsay.
"Now the shoe is on the other foot. It is for the BJP to explain to the nation whether they will apply same standards to themselves as they attempted to apply to the government by needlessly disrupting Parliament for the last few days," Tewari said.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


man or woman..eunuch perhaps...Varind do not ask questions...answer them yourself. Idiot...your party is dangerous & a 'saamp'...stupids like you in the name of religion will go to lengths to justify your haterd for others. The Congress even though they fail to govern as is expected are better at presenting themselves to the world.
BJP have never been the most favored party to rule the country and they have never been close to achieving mass support to giving them a chance of one-party rule. What they say in public has always had little or no effect in public as was evident from the Babri Masjid destruction when they assured a peaceful movement and turned it into an act of raw aggression of mob mentality. This one incident tarnished any faith in its ability to act wisely and hence, perceived as a party of doubtful intentions. The aging L. K. Advani's visit to Pakistan and his praises for Jinnah was another back-stabbing incident well entrenched in the public mind. These instances and many other double-faced actions of the BJP only confirm what Mulford has remarked upon.... to get into power, the BJP will tell the world one thing while secretly working deals to do just the opposite once power is in their grasp. Never trust a snake for you don't know which path it will take. Safer to be cautious of the BJP.
Who does not try to score Political point in Indian Politics. The main issue is who showed the bundles of money to US Diplomats and who bought the MPs. Congress has to answer these questions to the nation not the BJP.