
| Font Size |



New Zealand’s bowlers might think he is a bully, riding roughshod over them and trivialising their offerings. But he isn’t a bully either because all bullies are, inherently, cowards shying away when someone bigger comes along. Over the last eight years, Sehwag has taken on the quickest in demanding circumstances and sometimes he has won and sometimes he has lost. But he is willing to take on the bowlers and the conditions, not afraid to lose, and that is not a quality bullies possess!
There is a secret to his fearlessness, a trait that resides in all those who are happy to live with risk; or indeed risk as most of us perceive it. Sehwag is not afraid of getting out. It doesn’t mean he is lackadaisical or that batting is a reckless, momentary pursuit. It is just that his mind is free from the fear of defeat.
And as most of us would have seen in our own lives, the moment we contemplate defeat, we open our doors to it. I’m sure he is aware, like most of us are, that in the pursuit of success, failure is always a neighbour, a by-stander waiting to jump in. But the more we look sideways at this neighbour, the less we look ahead. Sehwag has this extraordinary ability to let failure jump in from time to time but not worry too much about it.
But then, he has always been like this. What explains this amazing burst, this transformation from a potentially great but terribly ordinary one-day batsman to one that bowlers around the world fear and who, in his last 20 games, averages 60 with a strike rate of 130? For years Sehwag was a huge under-achiever, averaging a mere 30 at the top of the order and possessed of a maddening urge to find the fielder at third man to a ball that was short and outside off stump. Now he hardly seems to get out there and surely it cannot be because bowlers have stopped bouncing it short and high outside his off stump? Is speed, or lack of it, the issue, or are bowlers indeed bowling fuller or is there a greater discretion in strokeplay?
My guess is that he now has a greater variety of shots, especially on the leg side. He always flicked the ball well off his pads but could be kept quiet by the ball that bounced into his rib cage. Now he seems to have a couple of shots for balls in that area. First, the trademark straight jab through mid-wicket, a shot achieved through his incredible bat speed. But more important, when it gets higher, he has started pulling the short ball. And anything that comes off the middle of the bat and achieves decent elevation goes out of the ground in New Zealand anyway!
I also suspect he is being given the space that every performer needs. Inherently, performers need to be happy souls; a trapeze artist worrying about his job will probably find the safety net. With Gambhir, Yuvraj and Raina batting well, Dhoni solid and reliable and Tendulkar still evergreen, Sehwag probably has the licence to play his brand of fearless cricket. And he seems to be carrying this freedom with a touch of gravity because it can be a thin line between bravery and recklessness. For Sehwag to find out how far his ability can take him, he must have the freedom to play in his style and this team, through its composition and attitude, is giving him this freedom.
And so Sehwag can embellish our game with his own brand of cricket; so different from the two greats of this era — Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar. Dravid is the kind who would study angles like a draftsman, work out the best ones to employ and then use his incredible work ethic to perfect them. Tendulkar, for all his genius, has never been independent of the field setting; either showing up gaps through his placement or creating them where he wants to by playing the ball elsewhere (see how he plays the paddle sweep which forces a fielder to be placed there and opens up a gap where he wants it to be opened).
But Sehwag looks upon the field placement as an independent event; something the opposition captain has to do but not anything he needs to worry about.
That is why it is a great game; because it has room for all kinds; and because it has room for Sehwag.


Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|


As usual a cheesy and mushy article from Harsha...just like your commentary your articles are just stating the obvious...i thought journalism was about giving something extra, something the readers don't already know..
Harsha,With due respects to your cricket experience, Sehwag does exactly what you said he doesn't do. Force the captain to change the field settings and then change his game accordingly. I have seen this happen in test matches where he hits boundaries if fielders are placed within circle and is content to take singles if fielders are placed in the boundary. That is why he is one of the most successful Indian batsman in test cricket.
Year 2004. Series--India vs Australia ODIs. Bracken bowling first ball of innings to Sehwag. Gets him out LBW. I think "If Indian cricket has to improve Sehwag has to go". Now--My words have come true.Sehwag has gone.But where? Gone against the bowlers. Gone for the kill. And has Indian batting improved. yes.By a huge margin. Can you imagine someone like Sehwag butchering the new ball early in the innings way back in 2004? I am sure Sehwag will be one of the new so-called Fab-4 (the other 3 being Dhoni, Yuvraj and ? well, this spot remains vacant and anyone from gambhir to raina to yusuf to zaheer can fit in)
You are right. For Sehwag fielders are mere impediments to the ball reaching the boundary. As long as the ball is high in the air the fielder cannot reach it and if it is hit fast enough the fielder may not even see it. Simple principles very effectively used. He is great in his own way. Mind you, NZ might have their own Sehwag in Ryder. The guy's timing is solid.
I don't think there has ever been a player like Sehwag.The fearlessness in his batting style is just out of the ordinary.