www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

‘A rare conviction for procedural default’

Font Size

Amrita Didyala

Posted: Feb 04, 2009 at 0249 hrs IST

Ahmedabad The conviction of Dr Paresh Sheth by the lower court happens to be a first-ever instance of holding a doctor guilty by a court in Gujarat for procedural default, believe Health Department officials.

While the Health Department has registered cases against 148 pathology labs (of the 3,050 registered labs in the state) for conducting illegal sex determination tests, it has filed 79 cases against doctors in the courts. Of these, 17 cases have been filed in the HC.

“While in the case of Dr Harshad Thakkar, who was caught in a sting operation carried out by the Health Department in March 2007 and who was booked under the PNDT (Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques) Act, the Supreme Court finally adopted a tough stance by ordering a stay on the sale of the machinery seized,” said Dr M S Ranawat, the consulting officer for the Act.

Ranawat said the present judgment was the first in a case, which was not supported by any hard-bound proof. “It was hard to get Dr Thakkar arrested in the case and his conviction is still pending. However, this being the first conviction, it will set an example in the entire country,” said Ranawat.

While the Health Department had earlier caught three doctors — Dr D N Prajapati in Palanpur, Dr Harshad Thakkar in Ahmedabad and Dr Bharat Bhope in Rajkot — red-handed in the sting operations, all the other cases did not have supporting evidence other than records, said Ranawat. In those cases, it was difficult to nail down the doctors, as they had adopted innovative ways to deal with the subject.

“This is one of the first few convictions in the country against a doctor for procedural default and it has come after a very long struggle,” said the Commissioner of Health, Amarjeet Singh.

He said, “The attitude of the judiciary towards the issue has been a cause of delay. Two years ago we held a weeklong seminar with two SC judges to sensitise the judiciary about the issue and explain why it is important to maintain records. And yet, it has taken so long for the first result to come,” said Singh.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Naxals kill 13 policemen, loot weapons

196 and counting... Punjab candidates line up at Dera for ‘blessings’ ahead of vote...

Now Mamata wants national holidays on Netaji, Tagore birth anniversaries

Anna's movement lacks ideological tethering: Aruna Roy

No knowledge of threat to Rushdie's life: Maharashtra police

Why this Af-Pak battle has all of Sharjah on the edge

Is Modi fasting to atone for 2002 riots? Cong

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map