www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Are terror laws just? Civil society debates

Font Size

Vinay Sitapati,VINAY SITAPATI

Posted: Jan 19, 2009 at 2319 hrs IST

New Delhi “Human rights are for human beings,” Joginder Singh, former CBI director provocatively said, “Not for inhuman terrorists.”

Singh was speaking at the half-day seminar on “Refugee Protection at a Time of Crisis: Migrants, Terrorists, and Refugees in India”, organised by the Public Interest Legal Support and Research Centre (PILSARC) in association with the Delhi Administration Officers Academic Forum (DAOAFA), on Saturday.

Singh was defending the tough new anti-terror laws the UPA government has passed but his comments drew sharp responses. Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the new laws were draconian, while senior journalist Siddharth Varadarajan said no false dichotomy should be made between human rights and the police. “The choice is not between a hard or soft state but between an intelligent or stupid state,” Varadarajan said. He said there has been very little application of the mind with regard to fixing systems that don’t work in India and are leading to terrorism.

To this suggestion, former Punjab top cop K P S Gill said it would be a case of the “Stockholm Syndrome” — to start “appreciating the terrorists”.

Sharp exchanges characterised much of the seminar. At one point, when Gill accused the “debate in this room” of being “disconnected from ground reality”, Supreme Court senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan said: “Mr Gill, it is you who is disconnected from reality. When you walk into police stations, the policeman will get up and salute you. When I walk in... the reaction is very different.”

K Mahesh, seminar co-organiser and DAOAFA president, said, “Our purpose was to get opposing views to clash, to make sure there was true and lively debate.”

Apart from the terror laws, the seminar also focussed on refugees and illegal immigration. India, like Pakistan, has not signed the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees or its 1967 Protocol. Despite the lack of statutory protection, Indian courts have been at the forefront in providing some measure of refugee protection to people threatened with deportation. Though there is a lack of specific legal protection, judicial protection is offered on an individual case basis, when needed.

The United Nations High Commission on Refugees’ chief in India, Montserrat Feixas Vihe, said the global number of refugees is increasing, and that these refugees are essentially victims of terrorism — and not perpetrators of terrorist attacks.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
tough anti terror law by anurag tripathi on 19 May 2009

whether tough anti terror law check terrorism or not?please on for ane against

terrorists' rights by beljamine on 05 Mar 2009

terrorists should have no rights to claim. human rights orgs should not be allowed to interfere on their behalf. it's their fault that criminals roam free.

Are terror laws just? Civil society debates by Suresh Rao on 29 Jan 2009

By getting slaughtered I wonder howwe remain human ?If Anti Terror laws are inhuman so be it I would rather a dead terrorist than risk loosing a loved one in my family

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Lining up to pawn the family gold

Question mark over Rushdie video chat

Pak parliament adopts resolution demanding Musharraf's arrest

Maharashtra ATS cracks 13/7, arrests 3

India steps up pressure on Norway for release of NRI children

PC, Montek dismiss reports of rift over ID project Aadhar

Upset over raid, UP health scam accused ‘shoots self’

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map