www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Arms licence to leaders: court seeks govt reply

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Jan 16, 2009 at 0207 hrs IST

Mumbai Following a public interest litigation seeking to revoke the arms licence granted to two persons, including a Bihar minister, the Bombay High Court on Thursday directed the state to reply within four weeks and asked the petitioner to issue a rejoinder in this regard within two weeks.

Petitioner Atul Bhagat, president of Uran Vikas Manch, claimed that the Navi Mumbai police commissioner had issued a licence to hold arms in favour of one Rajesh Dhage and Jamshed Ashraf.

According to the petition, Dhage is a resident of Samelpada in Nalasopara. He is a sitting corporator of Nalasopara Municipal Corporation. Ashraf obtained the licence through Nalasopara police station at Uran taluka with the address of JNPT at Uran shown as permanent residence. Bhagat alleges that Ashraf is a permanent resident of Bihar and contested election of Bihar Legislative Assembly. He was elected as a MLA and holds the post of Revenue Minister in Bihar. Bhagat stated that he had sought information on this through RTI several times but was denied the same.

He further stated that in June 2008 the duo submitted documents claiming that they were permanent residents of the area which falls under the police commissioner of Navi Mumbai and obtained the required permission.

Bhagat had made an application to the DGP which was forwarded to the police commissioner of Navi Mumbai, however no action was taken. Bhagat has however made it clear that he is not seeking any relief against the individuals but only directions for regulating the system for granting licences.

He has also sought action against delinquent police officers and suspension of licence till pendency of the case. Petitioner’s advocate Uday Warunjikar said, “We are saying that these are the examples and the system is not correct.”

He added, “We’re just seeking to regulate the system.” The hearing has been adjourned till March 5.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

No procedure, justice applied in deciding my age: Army chief

Let us not be over-sensitive about India, China ties: Krishna

After Guj HC snub, Modi takes Lokayukta row to apex court

JuD claims Imran Khan will attend its 'Defence of Pakistan' rally

Team Anna to kick start its campaign from Haridwar on Jan 21

Have foiled coup attempt to overthrow govt: Bangladesh Army

Jarawa video case: Police arrest 2 persons

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map