www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Bubble burst: firm to pay up for denying prize

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Jan 08, 2009 at 0216 hrs IST

Chandigarh Upholding an order of the Ludhiana district forum, the UT State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Perfetti India to pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation for denying the “grand prize” — a trip for two to the US — as promised on the wrapper of a Big Babol bubblegum to the complainant. The forum also ordered the firm to pay Rs 1 lakh as penal costs for misleading consumers.

The complainant, Jeevan Kumar, stated he had purchased a pack of bubblegum from Jasbir Singh, owner of a grocery shop in Ludhiana. On opening the wrapper, Kumar found a prize coupon bearing the digits 6,2,2 and 1 (the sum of which is 11) and, as per the scheme, was entitled to the first prize. The company was duly informed vide a fax message on February 12, 2001.

But Perfetti India stated that the wrapper, an image of which had been printed on the fax message, had been tampered with.

Kumar then filed a complaint with the Ludhiana district forum. Jasbir Singh also appeared as a witness in the case stating that Kumar had opened the said wrapper in his presence and the figures had totalled to 11.

Harish Arora, company secretary of Perfetti India, raised objections stating that the wrapper had been tampered with. “Also, the scheme was valid for just eight weeks wherein eight different number combinations totalling 11 were issued. Each combination was valid for one week and the prize-winning wrapper was to be faxed within two weeks of the date of declaration. Thus, all prize-winning wrappers would be valid only for a particular week, which had been printed on the wrapper before the four digits,” added Arora.

In 2002, the Ludhiana district consumer forum ruled in favour of the complainant. Later, Perfetti India filed an appeal to overturn the judgment and the case was transferred to UT.

Announcing the verdict, K C Gupta, president of the UT State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, said: “The appellant has not produced any specimen of the genuine wrapper or given an explanation as to how the wrapper was tampered with. Also, there is no record of any other consumer being awarded the prize that week.”

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

No procedure, justice applied in deciding my age: Army chief

Let us not be over-sensitive about India, China ties: Krishna

After Guj HC snub, Modi takes Lokayukta row to apex court

JuD claims Imran Khan will attend its 'Defence of Pakistan' rally

Team Anna to kick start its campaign from Haridwar on Jan 21

Have foiled coup attempt to overthrow govt: Bangladesh Army

Jarawa video case: Police arrest 2 persons

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map