www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Coop factory worker who was sacked due to political leanings gets his job back

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Mar 11, 2009 at 0158 hrs IST

Pune Eight years ago, Ravindra Taware, a cooperative sugar factory employee, paid with his job for having differing political leanings from his boss. He was fired despite putting in over 20 years of service for the cooperative because he had supported and worked for Ajit Pawar, against the candidature of factory chairperson Chanderrao Taware in the assembly election of 1999 in Baramati.

The decision has been overturned and the city labour court recently re-instated Ravindra Taware along with back wages, bonus and other allowances. According to his lawyer, Santosh Mhaske, the money owed to Taware is between Rs 2.5 lakh to Rs 3 lakh.

It was in 2001 when things took an unfortunate turn for Taware after he was appointed by the workers’ union as the director to represent them on the factory board. But Taware’s political leanings did not inspire confidence with the management.

A few days after he approached the management to join the board of directors, he was served with a suspension notice on the grounds of dereliction of duty and disobedience. On January 23, 2001, when Taware approached the management with a union letter supporting his nomination as the worker’s director, the management first ignored his petition. Soon after his supervisor filed a report saying that he had neglected his duties. On January 27, Taware was suspended from work.

“Chanderrao Taware, chairman of the respondent sugar factory contested the assembly election in 1999 as an independent candidate and as contended by the complainant (Ravindra Taware) he worked for his rival Ajit Pwar. Subsequently both leaders also contested the gram panchayat elections and the complainant was on the side of Ajit Pawar. That may be why Chanderrao Taware did not allow the complainant to sit with the board of directors as workers’ director,” said the labour court ruling.

Citing reasons for calling the suspension of the complainant (Taware) suspect, the court has observed that the cooperative did not call for Taware’s response. “Even otherwise the misconduct mentioned in the report of the overseer was not so serious in nature to suspend complainant immediately, that too without calling for his explanation. It appears that the entire episode was created by the respondent (the sugar cooperative) when the complainant (Taware) was appointed/nominated as a workers’ director,” the court said in its ruling. It has called the company’s decision "shockingly disproportionate."

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Rushdie cancels India visit, says 'paid assassins' out to kill him

Narendra Modi takes Sadbhavna Mission to Godhra

Age row: SC dismisses appeal supportive of Army chief's view

Law Commission for making honour killings non-bailable offence

Oz MP tells immigrants to learn English to stop racism

Uma Bharti's comments on Rahul not important: Azad

Digvijay rubbishes reports of quitting as UP poll in-charge

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map