www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Illegal construction: court seeks reply from chief secretary

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Feb 26, 2009 at 2326 hrs IST

Mumbai The Bombay High Court on Wednesday sought a reply from the chief secretary asking the reason why an earlier order regarding illegal constructions in Thane was not complied with. The court had on January 28 ordered a committee comprising chief secretary, principal secretaries of Urban Development, Rural Development, Finance, Energy and the director of municipal administration to submit report on what steps will be taken to deal with encroachment and pollution in Thane.

The committee was directed to give a timeframe— not more than six months— to implement the order. The government on Wednesday sought a court direction to relieve the chief secretary from the committee. The court, however, orally refused to agree to the request and directed the chief secretary to give the reasons in a week. The court was hearing three PILs on rampant unauhtorised construction in and around Vasai in Thane district.

Adovocate Uday Warunjikar, who appeared for the Harit Vasai Sanrakshan Samitee, one of the petitioners, had alleged that there were as many as five lakh illegal structures in the Thane district. The state government had last month told the court that it was planning to set up a civic police force to tackle illegal constructions.

An affidavit filed by Manu Kumar Shrivastav, secretary, Urban Development, had stated that the state was examining feasibility of setting up a 4-tier institutional framework. Policemen would be deputed for this purpose, he said. The court was also irked when a report by Maharashtra Pollution Control Board stated that municipal authorities at Vasai, Navaghar-Manikpur, Virar and Nalasopara were guilty of polluting Vasai creek. The affidavit by MPCB said criminal cases had been filed under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act against concerned officers.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

SC sets legal benchmark, rules in favour of Vodafone in Rs 11,000-cr tax battle...

SP promises Muslims quota, kids computers

Rushdie cancels India visit, says 'paid assassins' out to kill him

Rushdie calls off visit to Jaipur, litfest begins under security net

SC rejects PIL, clears stage for Army chief to argue case

Hormone shot that mimics exercise could be obesity epidemic holy grail

Narendra Modi takes Sadbhavna Mission to Godhra

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map