www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Insurance firm told to pay Rs 19.5 lakh compensation

Font Size

Express news service

Posted: Feb 02, 2008 at 0057 hrs IST

Chandigarh, February 1 The UT State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Panchkula, to pay a compensation of Rs 19.54 lakh along with interest of 12 per cent per annum to Rishab Refractories Limited of Patiala.

The commission mentioned in its order that an interest of 12 per cent per annum would be applicable on the compensation amount after the date of submission of survey report from August 4, 2005. The insurance firm was also asked to pay Rs 3,100 as costs of litigation.

The company stated that the stock and raw material, semi-finished and finished goods that they purchased were insured with the firm from time to time as per the stock available. The company had got its stock worth Rs 1 crore insured with the insurance company.

The petitioner further stated that on the night of August 2, 2004, there was heavy rain in the area. It rained continuously for 48 hours, which damaged the goods of the company. The company complained about it to the police for which a DDR was registered.

The insurance firm, on getting the intimation letter from the company, appointed a surveyor to investigate the matter. The surveyor visited the factory premises and prepared the list of insured items which were not affected by the rain, valued around Rs 20.6 lakh, while the company estimated the loss to be Rs 80.74 lakh. As there was delay in finalisation of the claim, the company served them a legal notice in February 2005. Later, the petitioner got a reply from the insurance firm stating that the surveyor has assessed the damage to the tune of Rs 6.77 lakh.

The insurance firm, however, denied there being any delay on their part in settling the claim. They stated that the delay was due to the non-cooperative approach of the petitioner.

The commission headed by K C Gupta stated that the insurance firm has been deficient in providing services to the company and they are entitled to full indemnification of the loss suffered by it, along with compensation for deficiency in service. Based on the analysis, the commission partly allowed the claim.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Rushdie cancels India visit, says 'paid assassins' out to kill him

Narendra Modi takes Sadbhavna Mission to Godhra

Age row: SC dismisses appeal supportive of Army chief's view

Has no intention of taking action against army chief Kayani: Pak govt

Digvijay rubbishes reports of quitting as UP poll in-charge

1984 riot victims burn Sonia effigy

Uma's entry in poll fray to increase infighting in BJP, says Digvijay

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map