www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Kumar feared he might not get his share: EOW in court

Font Size

Utkarsh Anand

Posted: Jan 13, 2009 at 0238 hrs IST

New Delhi Whistleblower Deepak Kumar was in the scam team from the very beginning, and along with co-accused Vijay Patanjali, Suresh and Laxmi Narayan Meena drew up the elaborate plan to rig the DDA allotments, the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) has said.

In a remand application in court, the EOW has said Kumar knew the technicalities of the process, and was also “given leverage to make investments in the said conspiracy”. It is reported Kumar was “pampered” for his knowledge on how to procure loans easily as he had earlier worked with Barclays and Citibank.

The EOW also said Kumar approached activist Udit Raj — the complainant and the head of the Indian Justice Party — in a calculated move. The application stated Kumar fell out with the group because he feared he might be sidelined.

The remand applications says: “He has further revealed that after the closure of the scheme and before the draw of the scheme, he sensed... they may not allow him to take the benefit of the share which was to be reaped after the sale of the properties of the successful allottees.”

Arrested on Sunday, Kumar and co-accused Suresh Kumar, were forwarded particulars of many ‘applicants’ belonging to the Meena community in Rajasthan.

After collecting these documents, they applied for the flats in Delhi. They also forged signatures on the forms and bank documents, the EOW has said.

Two days after the draw, Suresh informed the ‘applicants’ in Jhunjhunu that seven had been lucky. The villagers were reluctant to sign the papers, but were coerced into doing so.

The EOW has also said Kumar is not cooperating in the investigation. His counsel Jinendra Jain has refuted these allegations. “Kumar knew it all at the initial stages but would not be part of it. That is why he told on the accused,” said Jain.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Desire for 'high lifestyle' driving educated girls to sex trade: SC

Cong advertisement in Gujarat praises Modi

Dravid likely to announce retirement shortly

Illegal mining: Probe against SM Krishna 'premature', rules SC

SC stays HC order granting bail to Maoist leader Kobad Ghandy

Armymen asked not to show affiliation to force on social sites

BJP revives Ram Temple issue ahead of UP polls

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map