www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Lawyers attack Waliullah in court

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Feb 12, 2009 at 0254 hrs IST

Lucknow A group of lawyers manhandled Waliullah, accused in the Varanasi blasts of 2006, as he was emerging from the courtroom on Wednesday.

The accused, who had appeared before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, had to take shelter in the courtroom. Later, he was escorted to safety.

Earlier, Waliullah had been attacked by groups of lawyers in Lucknow, Varanasi and Ghaziabad.

The case had been transferred to Ghaziabad due to attacks on him. But there too, he was assaulted by advocates the first day he was produced in court.

The court had summoned Waliullah following an appeal filed by the state government against an acquittal order of August 26, 2008 by Additional District and Sessions Judge (ADSJ).

Waliullah had been acquitted of charges of waging war against the government and sedition.

On Wednesday, Waliullah had appeared before the Bench of Imtiyaz Murtuza and SC Chaurasia. A group of over 50 lawyers, meanwhile, had gathered outside the courtroom and the moment Waliullah walked out they pounced on him. He ran inside the courtroom to escape the attack and took shelter in the judge’s cabin.

Paresh Pandey, Superintendent of Police (West), who led the team that escorted Waliullah to safety, said: “We rushed to the spot to find the lawyers raising slogans and creating a ruckus. It took over half-an-hour to disperse them and get Waliullah out.”

Waliullah was accused of orchestrating the blasts at Sankatmochan temple on March 7, 2006, which had claimed over 70 lives and injured over 100 others.

The state’s Special Task Force had arrested him in Lucknow’s Gosainganj on April 5, 2006.

In an order on August 26, the ADSJ SC Tripathi had sentenced him to 10 years’ jail in a case under Unlawful Activities Act and given him another three-year term owing to the recovery of arms and ammunition from his possession.

The court, however, had acquitted him in the case of Sections 121 (waging war against government), 22 (collecting arms and ammunition for waging war) and 124-A (sedition) of the Indian Penal Code as the police had failed to submit adequate evidence.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

SC sets legal benchmark, rules in favour of Vodafone in Rs 11,000-cr tax battle...

SP promises Muslims quota, kids computers

Rushdie cancels India visit, says 'paid assassins' out to kill him

Rushdie calls off visit to Jaipur, litfest begins under security net

SC rejects PIL, clears stage for Army chief to argue case

Hormone shot that mimics exercise could be obesity epidemic holy grail

Narendra Modi takes Sadbhavna Mission to Godhra

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map