www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

Reliance Insurance directed to pay mediclaim to city advocate

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Jan 02, 2009 at 2357 hrs IST

Chandigarh The district Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum has directed Reliance General Insurance Company to pay Rs 1 lakh as mediclaim to an advocate member of the High Court Lawyers Public Charitable Trust. The company has also been directed to pay Rs 10,000 as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment.

According to the complaint, filed by the trust, 1682 advocate members of the trust including complainant Sanjay Nagpal were insured with Reliance Insurance against a premium of Rs 36, 56, 30. They had availed of the Group Mediclaim Insurance Policy, which was valid upto August 15, 2008.

Nagpal along with his spouse and two children were insured for a mediclaim policy to the tune of Rs 1 lakh.

In January last year, Sanjay had a fall in the premises of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and was taken to a dispensary where he was diagnosed with hypertension. Thereafter, he visited the Fortis Hospital in Mohali for a medical checkup and was advised an MRI, the results of which were normal. His angioplasty results, however, revealed a double vessel disease. After getting discharged from the hospital, he submitted a mediclaim of Rs 1 lakh for reimbursement to the insurance company. The claim, however, was rejected by the company.

In its reply, Reliance Insurance said that the complainant had first moved an application for cashless hospitalisation which was turned down as it was found to be a case of a pre-existing disease. After discharge from the

Fortis Hospital, he had filed a claim. The discharge history revealed that it was a pre-existing disease, thus the claim was rightly repudiated.

The forum ruled that at the time of taking the policy or filling the proposal form thereof, the advocate was not aware of any disease or the symptoms as was being alleged by the

insurance company. The panel of medical practitioners constituted by the company had also not made any such observation and as per the agreement, the advocate was liable to get the claim.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Naxals kill 13 policemen, loot weapons

196 and counting... Punjab candidates line up at Dera for ‘blessings’ ahead of vote...

Now Mamata wants national holidays on Netaji, Tagore birth anniversaries

Anna's movement lacks ideological tethering: Aruna Roy

No knowledge of threat to Rushdie's life: Maharashtra police

Why this Af-Pak battle has all of Sharjah on the edge

Is Modi fasting to atone for 2002 riots? Cong

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map