All the six accused have been booked for criminal conspiracy, attempt to murder and under various sections of the IPC, UAPA, Explosives Act, Explosive Substances Act and the Arms Act. The defence argued that as there was no intention established of killing a particular person and the target was not defined, therefore, attempt to murder charge was not applicable. Special public prosecutor Rohini Salian told the court that the accused had larger agenda in hand and were on common mind of striking terror and hence no question of an individual target arose.

Defence advocate Sanjiv Punalekar had also argued that the accused did not fit the definition of a “terrorist” and should not have been slapped with the stringent UAPA. Punalekar said that “the entire matter has been hyped up by the police. Had this incident occurred a decade ago, the police would have booked the same accused for mischief and not for terrorism”.