www.expressindia.com - Weather | Horoscope | Stocks | RSS
expressindia web city
HomeBlogsCricketAstrology TendersClassifieds Reader Comments Hotels
Sign In / Register | Archive
Expressindia » Story

What steps taken to prevent attacks, court asks state and central govts

Font Size

Express News Service

Posted: Dec 05, 2008 at 0242 hrs IST

Mumbai In the wake of public interest litigations (PIL) prompted by the terror attacks, the Bombay High Court on Thursday issued notices to Maharashtra and Central governments asking them to file affidavits explaining the steps taken or to be taken to prevent terrorist attacks in future.

The directive came in response to two PILs filed in the wake of the November 26 attacks in the metropolis that killed 171 persons and injured over 300.

While one PIL filed by a city-based advocate V P Patil seeks action against top bureaucrats and politicians for their “negligence” in doing their jobs, and in letting the attacks take place, the other filed by Society for Indian Law Firms (SILF) asks for implementation of reforms like the Quick Response Team and other constructive measures to safeguard the city from future terrorist attacks.

A division bench headed by Chief Justice Swatanter Kumar asked the government on whether right to live with safety is part of fundamental right?

“Please examine whether constitutional rights to life also cover right to live with safety and a sense of security,” the court said. In an apparent reference to media coverage of the terror strikes, the Chief Justice said exposition of security plan by ‘media’ had gone too far. It would be an issue to be examined in one of the PILs, he said.

The court has also asked the petitioners to make the Bombay Chamber of Commerce as party respondent to the petition.

Senior counsel Iqbal Chagla, who appeared for the SILF, submitted that this is not a time to delve into the past, nor to point fingers but to safeguard the city in a constructive manner. He stated that the chief minister had already announced constitution of State Security Council, which meets SILF’s demand for a citizen’s committee.

Chagla said that Justice B N Srikrishna be made the chairman of the council — he was agreeable — and suggested names of a few others who could be its members. It includes Javed Akhatar, Shabana Azmi, Jamshed Kanga, former Army Chief V P Malik, Julio Rebeiro and others.

Chief Justice said that to be effective, such a council should have people holding official positions with the government. While Patil’s PIL alleges that there was a systemic failure which allowed the terror attacks to happen, the society of law firms is pressing for setting up of a citizens committee to tackle the menace of terrorism.

PIL by SILF has sought that recommendations of National Police Commission and McKinsey report on police reforms be implemented. There have been 10 terror attacks in Mumbai since 1993 serial blasts, SILF has said, pointing out that the city of New York, on the other hand, has not witnessed a single attack after 9/11 incident.

Patil’s PIL also seeks inquiry commission to probe security lapses. It seeks action against national security advisor M K Narayanan too. The court, however, refused to issue notices to individuals.

The court has given the state and union governments two weeks time to file their replies. “The petition is not to set up and enquiry commission but to focus on constructive measures to be put in place,” a member of the SILF said.

Discuss this story on expressindia forums
Post Comments
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
Message*
Characters remaining
 
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Latest News

Business

Showbiz

Sports

Angry Rushdie claims police 'invented' plot to keep him away

Age row: Former Army chief backs Gen V K Singh

One Indian killed, 6 injured in deadly Nigerian attacks

Congress backs Rahul, BJP distrusts Varun: book

DoT asks Tata for Idea shareholding data

FICCI fears reaction post-Vodafone verdict

Olympics: 2012 mascots in China 'sweat shop' row

More
© 2011 The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved
Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Express Group | Site Map