|
March
8, 2002
|
|
In
Mahatma’s land, it isn’t always the Mahatma’s way
|
The
seesaw state
First
and foremost, let’s get one thing straight. The land of the Mahatma
is by no means a peaceful land. In 1985, travelling to Ahmedabad
on the trail of the same ironic conundrum that hangs over the recent
horrific events in Gujarat (namely, ‘violence in the land of the
Mahatma’), I found hair-raising stories of arson and murder by hacking,
expert knifing and burning both in the then ongoing anti-reservation-turned
sectarian riots and in the past. In 1969, 2500 had died in less
than a week. But then violence is part of human nature. What made
the Mahatma special was that he found a way to rise above it.
The
base and the transcendent. This dichotomy is apparent all over the
state. If Ahmedabad sheltered the likes of hooch king Abdul Latif,
it also spawned Ela Bhatt’s inspiring Self Employed Womens’ Association.
Surat emerged from filth and disease in the last decade to become
the second cleanest city in the country. In Gondal, rife with stories
of the doings of a notorious local clan, there are also stoops built
by a visionary maharajah for weary passers-by to rest their loads.
Perhaps last year’s earthquake provided the best example of the
divide: the heartlessness of people selling marked up tents donated
for free distribution and the humanity of those who set up community
kitchens.
The
question is: which side will win?
| Though anti-minority attitudes have gained
ground in Gujarat, some local observers eschew the spontaneous
reaction to Godhra theory to explain the aftermath |
About
a year ago, on a trip to Ahmedabad, an acquaintance took me to see
the region’s latest marvel: a lavish temple in Gandhinagar. A prototype
of several built all over the state, this particular one was a sprawling
affair with pillars in baby pink sandstone, ornate balconies, gold
leaf and marble. There was fast food, rides with names like ‘Dragon
Rider’ and gaudy tableaux in the garden. Synthetic heaven an hour’s
drive away from Gandhi’s ashram sitting on its dry river bed. From
khadi to polyester.
The
comparison is not incidental. Flipping through a prominent magazine’s
list of influential Indians recently, I found only one Gujarati
mentioned in the five decades since Gandhi and Vallabhbhai Patel:
Dhirubhai Ambani. A telling comment on the direction taken. Which
is not of course to undermine the achievements of Ambani and his
ilk. Indeed, enterprise and diligence are hallmarks of this western
community, qualities that have ushered modernisation into its towns
and villages and scattered its people all over the globe. Though,
in terms of baggage, the Gujarati can be like a tortoise, a characteristic
that gives rise to unique phenomena such as disco dandiya and the
only vegetarian Pizza Hut in the world.
Caste
has always been a significant factor in the state, deeply ingrained
in social relations. Religion, also an integral part of life, is
taking on a new appeal. In a tiny shop selling holy Hindu paintings
in Rajkot a year ago, the shopkeeper told me his customers were
increasingly the young and the NRI. Regardless of strong religious
sentiment and the periodic outbreak of sectarian violence over the
years, however, Muslims and Hindus have been more closely integrated
in Gujarat than in many other parts of the country. During Partition,
Ahmedabad was relatively incident free. And in general there is
a larger degree of interaction and commonality in terms of dress,
language and attitudes.
In
fact, locals have always averred that past riots were manufactured
by politicians. In 1969, the hidden agenda was said to be the hostility
between Indira Gandhi and Morarji Desai; in 1985 upper class Congressmen
whipped up resentment against then chief minister Madhavsinh Solanki’s
KHAM (Kshatriya-Harijan-Adivasi-Muslim) formula. And the early ’90s
riots followed the complete rout of the Congress in the state.
In
fact, 1989 saw the BJP go from 1 seat in the previous assembly poll
to 12. In the same election, Congressmen were defeated with colossal
margins. Though the reasons were many, one identified by outgoing
chief minister Amarsinh Chaudhary was the Ram Janmabhoomi issue
and the effective spadework done by the VHP in the villages. Since
then, as one columnist has pointed out, Gujarat has been used by
the sangh parivar as a laboratory for militant Hindutva with many
of the early attacks against Christian missionaries carried out
there. If the Congress had paid at least lip service to the concept
of secularism, with the BJP in ascent that fig leaf was removed.
As
far as the recent bout of violence is concerned, a comprehensive
picture has yet to emerge. How the horrific incident at Godhra occurred,
if there was indeed a deeper conspiracy — is still not fully clear.
On the other hand, though anti-minority attitudes have gained ground
in Gujarat as in other parts of the country, some local observers
eschew the spontaneous reaction to Godhra theory to explain the
aftermath pointing to the last relatively incident-free decade in
the state and suggest a political hand following the BJP’s recent
reversals and the emergence of Narendra Modi as chief minister.
But
looking to the past, if there is one connection that is rarely made
between the Mahatama and violence in Gujarat, it is that with peace
Gandhi also taught people to agitate for their rights. In Gujarat
this legacy had a somewhat unconventional result: a relatively peaceful
labour class banded under the Gandhian Majoor Mahajan and a militant
middle class. In 1964 the latter fought the Mongvari Hatao movement;
in 1974 it waged the influential Nav Nirman movement. And in 1981
and 1985, it spearheaded the anti-reservation riots.
The
reasons were economic: inflation and the potential loss of professional
seats in colleges. In 1985 students voluntarily discontinued atten-
ding classes and parents were seen actually preventing children
from attending school in two of Ahmedabad’s largest schools. Given
this background one can put in context perhaps the stories emanating
from Gujarat these days of people ransacking stores and the middle
class turning up in their Santros and Marutis to loot or to buy
at throwaway prices from the makeshift stalls set up by rioters.
How
will all this play out? Kartikeya Sarabhai who runs the Ahmedabad-based
Centre for Environment Education talks despondently of the powerful
imagery of the burning train at Godhra (shades of Partition) and
the new levels of behaviour sanctified by recent events: the targeted
economic destruction and the Viking-like glee of the middle class
in taking home the spoils of rioting. An Ahmedabad-based writer
says the only hope lies in the silent majority that does not believe
in arson and murder to speak up.
The
base and the transcendent. In many ways Gujarat is only a test case.
The real question is how India, the land of the Mahatma, will measure
up.
|