|
June
27, 2001
|
|
How
Shah Abdur Razzaq met Ram and Lakshman
|
Fables
of faith
Kha-pi
ke ghar main baithye aur gaiye bhajan
Kashi se jal, Prag se amrood leejiye...
(Refresh yourself by singing bhajans, and by getting water from
Banaras and guavas from Allahabad)
I
bet you have not heard of Abdur Rahman of Bijnor, a graduate of
the M.A.O. College at Aligarh, and his comment that, besides the
Divan-e Ghalib (Collection of Ghalib’s poetry), the Rig Veda was
India’s revealed book. For some critics, this was blasphemy, pure
and simple. Thanks to Jagjit and Chitra Singh, most of you have
heard of Ghalib. But do you know what he wrote about Kashi or Banaras?
This is not all. Long before Bijnori and Ghalib, a great Sufi by
the name of Syed Abdur Razzaq (1836-1724), lived in a tiny village
called Bansa, in the region called Awadh. Symbolising the ecumenical
traditions in the self-contained world of the Sufis, he took part
in Diwali celebrations and watched bakhtiyas perform the life of
Krishna. He had visions of Ram and Lakshman; and Krishna would send
his salam to him.
|
More
than 30 years later, Ghalib still remembered his stay with
pleasure: ‘what praise is too high for Banaras? Where else
is there a city to equal it?’
|
We
know little about them, because they are remote from us in time.
Let’s, therefore, begin with the more familiar figure of Mirza Asadullah
Khan Ghalib. In October 1827, he set out for Kolkata. Part of the
way he travelled by river; and the final stage, from Banaras to
Kolkata, he did on horseback. He reached Kolkata on February 20,
1828 — near enough a whole year after he had set out from Delhi.
Banaras particularly enchanted him; hence the long lyrical Persian
poem of 108 couplets in its praise. It is entitled, ‘Chiragh-i dair’
(The Lamp of the Temple). The beauties of Banaras have ‘their coquetry
in a rose garden intoxicated and brim-full of blandishments; their
graceful walking embraces the hundred turmoils of Judgement Day!’
By contrast, Allahabad (Prayaga) was a ghost city, dull and uninspiring,
its people unfriendly and inhospitable. Such was his revulsion that
he decided not to touch Allahabad on his journey back home.
Our
poet, having rented a haveli at Sarai Naurangabad, spent a month
in the city of Shiva. From its alleged founding in the sixth century
BC, it had grown to be one of northern India’s largest in early
19th century. The region, moreover, was one of the most densely
populated on the subcontinent, more than twice as dense as any European
country. Ghalib noticed the daily arrival of pilgrims seeking salvation,
or taking part in seasonal fairs and eclipses. He enjoyed, as he
sat down to write to friends, the paradise-like environment of natural
beauty, the temple bells ringing, and the devotees walking hurriedly
towards the Ganga. He felt invigorated by the salubrious climate,
the forests along the river, the streams and waterways all through
the city. His poetic description of the Ganga reveals, more than
any other dimension, his patriotic revaluation of the country’s
common cultural and religious heritage.
In
another long Persian poem Ghalib argues that the special customs
of a country must not be destroyed. Rejecting infidelity (rasm-i
kufr) was all very well, but rejecting the Divine Bounty made little
sense. ‘Negation without affirmation is nothing but error’; indeed,
one cannot affirm God and deny his signs. Kashi was, thus, a ‘sign’
of God. Besides its all-India prominence as a centre for pilgrimage
and worship, it was a microcosm of Indian life, customs and popular
belief. It was indeed, so wrote Ghalib, the Kaaba of India. In his
view, ‘if Ganga hadn’t rubbed its forehead at the feet of Banaras,
it wouldn’t be pure. And if the sun hadn’t sailed through its nooks
and corners, it wouldn’t be so bright.’
More
than 30 years later Ghalib still remembered his stay with pleasure:
‘what praise is too high for Banaras? Where else is there a city
to equal it? The days of my youth were almost over when I went there.
Had I been young in those days I would have settled down there and
never come back this way.’
Finally,
it is instructive to turn to Shah Abdur Razzaq of Bansa, a site
of piety and devotion, and to observe the triumph with which he
brought back, from his forays into the neighbouring districts, the
‘Little Traditions’ into his worldview. He visited the Magh mela
at Allahabad, interacted with the jogis and Bairagis, joined the
theatrical performances featuring popular stories about Krishna
and the gopis, and often went into a state of ecstasy listening
to Kabir’s verses. In this dimension, the Hindu gods were also his
friends and thereby the well wishers of all the disciples and followers
among the Muslims as well. Two of his well-known disciples were
Champat, the leader of the Bairagis from Awadh, Chaitram and Parasram.
A disciple of Champat, in fact, experienced a vision of Krishna
after Shah Abdur Razzaq recited some Hindi mantras. On another occasion,
his miracle made it possible for Parasram to feed his guests at
a feast he had organised. The final story is located somewhere in
the Deccan. Here, walking through a dense forest, Shah Abdur Razzaq
met Ram and Lakshman near a pool (without knowing their identity).
They treated him as their guests, offered sweets to him, and left
behind a lion and a bear for his protection. The next morning the
two, leading a herd of cows and buffaloes, showed up and directed
the Shah to the village. Later, when he returned to discover their
identity, he found that they had disappeared. Their disappearance
confirmed his belief that they were, in fact, the great Ram and
Lakshman. Indeed, the Shah believed that the two had fully realised
their essential oneness with the Divine Being in whose likeness
they were made, being counterparts of the ontological Perfect Man
of Sufis.
The
historian’s task is not to speculate on what might have been. His
duty is to show what happened and why. I have tried to do so. Some
of the other key questions, ie, the causes for the erosion of composite
values and the rise of religious-based identities, can barely be
answered in this column. Yet, I share these stories with you, hoping
that you will be sensitised to our plural heritage, and not be misled
by the rhetoric of Hindu and Muslim fundamentalists. There is plenty
for you to do. Please remember what Akbar Allahabadi (1846-1921)
had to say: ‘I say the same to Hindus and the Muslims:/Be good,
each, as your faith would have you be./The world’s a rod? Then you
become as water./Clash like the waves, but still remain one sea.’
|