|
Towards
an endgame
It
is one thing to write about death and reflect upon its implications
on society, and another thing to experience personal loss, despair,
grief, desolation and the failure to comprehend the death of a person
near to oneself.
An
ethnography of dying which has yet to be written would
have to include the emotional involvement of the dying and the bereaved,
it would have to cope with the silence before death, besides considering
concepts of death and the cultural practices related to it. I quote
these lines as a poignant comment on Gujarats bloody record
in recent weeks.
While
the affected families mourn the dead, Navratri is being celebrated
throughout the country. But this Navratri is different from previous
ones. An anguished mother goddess travels from north to south and
east to west, appalled by the conduct of some of her devotees in
Gujarat who gang-raped, abducted and burnt alive Muslim women. As
her numerous devotees flock to her temples with cries of Jai
Mata Di, she turns around, with pain writ large on her face,
exhorting them to maintain and foster inter-faith harmony.
The omnipresent
Mata stands amidst the debris of mosques and dargahs, bemoaning the
loss of the nations priceless heritage. This kind of vandalism
is truly unprecedented in free India. Indeed, if Lord Rama had his
way, he would return from Ayodhya, in the august company of Lord Hanuman,
to rebuild the dargah of Wali Dakhini and Ustad Fayyaz Khan, and repair
the damage caused to mosques and shrines and madarsas. Given a chance,
he would have waged war against the Ravanas in Gujarat.
Invoking
the Gita or the Ramayana will cut no ice with the practitioners
of hate and violence. They have done irreparable damage to their
faith and their Hindu heritage. There are other signs of degradation
as well. A political party that adheres to no moral or ethical values
governs us. Besides violating constitutional norms, it forges unprincipled
alliances to stay in power. Now, of course, it is out in the open
with its dagger pointed at not just the Muslims and Christians but
all those who swear by the Constitution of India.
The
BJP, the prime culprit, has seized the political initiative from
its NDA partners, who were caught napping, to plot its own independent
trajectory. With its declining electoral fortunes and the resurgence
of the Congress, it has decided to shed its ideological inhibitions
to clamour for a Hindu Rashtra. The gamble may not pay off, especially
if the Congress, now holding office in 14 states, gives up its lazy
habits and resorts to mass mobilisation on a continental scale.
The message from Guwahati offers some hope and comfort.
Meanwhile,
the left parties must abandon their doctrinaire approach vis-a-vis
each other, raise the level of popular consciousness, and act in
unison with NGOs in order to forge an effective front against the
beastly communal forces. Otherwise, the BJP-RSS-Shiv Sena will,
uninhibitedly, invent yet another divisive issue to further polarise
communal sentiments across the board. In that event, the left, already
fatigued by its excessive reliance on parliamentary processes at
the exclusion of mass mobilisation, will be further marginalised.
Moreover, we will be back to the dark days when L.K. Advanis
rath yatra left, in its wake, death and destruction.
In
this context, it is important to underline, first of all, that the
prime ministers speech in Panaji provides a blueprint for
his partys manifesto, and a guide to the BJP-RSS cadres to
deepen their hostilities against the minorities. Second, he has
seemingly abrogated his role as the countrys prime minister
and, instead, acted as the spokesperson of the RSS-BJP combine.
Finally, by raising the spectre of a green menace and, in addition,
expressing some unfriendly comments about the Muslims, he has implicitly
but nebulously floated the two-nation theory. It is
for opposition parties, as indeed the NDA partners, to debate the
dangerous streak of duplicity in such utterances. Though
the immediate issue is the fate of the Modi government, their conclusions
will have a bearing on the survival of Indias democratic and
secular polity.
Clearly,
statements emanating from Panaji and elsewhere are designed to undermine
the confidence of the minorities, and instill in them a sense of
fear and panic. What, then, is the way out? While the minorities
should unequivocally reject the communal rhetoric and eschew the
path of violence and confrontation, they need to emerge from the
safe confines of legislatures, classrooms and law courts to fight
for their civic rights. They must act in unison with secular forces
for fostering secular and democratic goals. Fear, complacency and
passivity, at this juncture, will be construed as an admission of
defeat. Hence, the sphinx-like silence on the campuses at Aligarh,
Jamia Millia and Jamia Hamdard will not do.
Those
habituated to agitating over religious issues should read the writing
on the wall and draw a lesson or two from the following lines by
Martin Niemoler (1892-1984): In Germany the Nazis came first for
the Communists. And I did not speak because I was not a Communist.
And then they came for the Jews. And I did not speak because I was
not a Jew. Then they came for the Trade Unions. And I did not speak
up. Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Catholics.
And I was a Protestant and so I did not speak up. Then they came
for me. And by that time there was no one left to speak for anyone.
Meanwhile,
the prime minister should be reminded of what Maulana Azad said
at the Congress session in 1940. I am proud of being an Indian.
I am part of the indivisible unity that is Indian nationality. I
am indispensable to this noble edifice and without me this splendid
structure of India is incomplete. I am an essential element which
has gone to build India. I can never surrender this claim.
Dr M.A. Ansari, another jehadi Muslim who presided over
the Congress session in 1927, had this to say: I consider
the brotherhood of man as the only real tie, and partitions based
on race or religion are, to my mind, artificial and arbitrary, leading
to divisions and factious fights. Nationalism of a general and liberal
type I can appreciate, but not the jingo nationalism of the German
or the Italian type.
Today,
we experience the jingo nationalism of the Hindutva variety. So,
Durga Ma, I appeal to you to descend on this land and offer the
hand of peace and reconciliation. Victory, as always, is yours for
the asking. When politicians turn demons, we seek your intercession.
|