| |
|
January
16, 2001
|
|
Dagger
Drawn
|
|
NINA
PILLAI
|
Mumbai
Blues
To a casual
observer, India this past week presented all the masala of a tasty
curry, spiced with layers of tear-spilling onion, in the Bharat
Shah saga, a large pinch of salt in Stephen Hawking and the String
theory, a liberal sprinkling of masala in the visit of Li Peng and
a healthy dose of soul fry in the Kumbh Mela -- ingredients that
made for a good curry or even a potboiler (Hindi film style), that
had the city hold its collective breath and heave a sigh.
Bharat Shah's
arrest shocked Mumbai in that there was an air of disbelief and
sorrow amongst his nears and dears, yet joyful glee amongst the
green-eyed monsters of jealousy and envy, cloaked in the garb of
arbiters of the faith, and self righteous piety. This cold unfeeling,
betrayal by people who once befriended you, albeit in merrier times,
shows us how shallow the world we inhabit is and how apt the truism
`you come alone and you go alone'.
The merits of
the case and its speedy trial is now a matter for the judiciary
and they can act only when the police complete their investigation
but even for a moment contemplate a scenario that Bharat Shah is
innocent then the blatant mockery of the system that the trial by
the press has ensured will be amply highlighted. If indeed the tapes
exist and are held as conclusive proof, I urge the authorities to
make copies of the tape and ensure their safety as things have a
habit of mysteriously disappearing when convenient and strangely
no questions are raised. A case in point is the infamous evidence
against the `anti national', high profile cricketers, each of them
vilified by a hostile media to the point of ostracisation, yet the
mighty CBI could not find a shard of evidence against any of them
and they were let off with a rap on the knuckles.
The `tapes'
against them recorded conversations with bookies who were in the
control of the subversive underworld warlords, yet has any of this
evidence ever been produced anywhere other than as hearsay? It can
be said that the tapes if they existed was potent evidence but what
happened to them? It was patently unfair to throw the book at some
of our ace cricketers damage their reputations, ruin their careers,
caste aspirations on their character merely to censure them.
I now come to
the crux of the matter, if the rights of a citizen in a democracy
is impinged upon, especially the right to freedom, what restitution
does our system ensure to the individual who is perhaps innocent?
Is he compensated monetarily, does the state make amends, does the
free press carry the denials that ensue? No! he is merely left to
crawl back into the shell that his life has now become to try and
pick up some of the pieces and muddle on as best as he can. It is
frightening thought that our liberty can be lost at the whim of
a power that be, in a nano second, perhaps to be restored at the
the whim of another power figure at, some later date, all to satiate
the irresistible crab mentality of the top drawer few, living in
glass houses.
Greed has become
the acceptable face of raw ambition and the blind pursuit of material
gain taints the film world like no other, as stars are broken or
made every Friday and an actor is only as good as his last film's
success or failure. If into this mixture of quick black money, greed,
fame and fortune, an element of fear and intimidation is thrown
in, Hey Pesto! Reel life and real life begin to merge.
It then means
a compromise with the unsavoury element, which a majority plump
for, versus living in the shadow of death forever. Can this pass
for reasonable choice in any civilised society?
If the politician,
the bureaucrat, the media tycoon or industrialist was thus threatened
what would be the reaction? A severe crackdown on that unsavoury
layer of the underworld for starters. Weak and vulnerable as film
world is perceived to make them easy prey as they do not have full
scale industry status yet, which forecloses legitimate money channels.
A hit film makes collections of crores week after week, a good percentage
of it from the parallel economy, now doesn't that sound like easy
pickings? Yet over-stepping or crossing the Lakshmanrekha can have
disastrous consequences as we now witness in the Bharat Shah case.
We all count
amongst our friends film stars but how often do we ask them about
the brush they must constantly have with the mafia? Narco terrorism,
smuggling, hawala, extortion and threat to life are all very palpable
aspects of the Mumbai we live in as indeed New York or London and
have to be tackled with ominous precision, the task of the savvy
police force is no mean one but `innocent till proven guilty' is
the basic tenant of our judicial system and honour it we must.
In France, the
son of the late President Mitterand is on trial for arms dealing,
yet he is out on bail, as is the then Foreign Minister of France,
who has trial dates set for January. In England, Nadeem secured
bail till his trial was posted. A natural surmise to all these high-profile
trials is `innocent till proven guilty' and therefore bail is the
precedent. Again, I would like to highlight that no man seeks to
be an exile from his own country and even die-hard criminals dream
of a return to their homeland, their own country.
With vast business
interests in India even the powerful Hinduja brothers, despite having
a country of residence outside India, are willing to come home this
month to put up a fight to clear their name in the Bofors case,
on condition that they were not going to be harassed.
I laud the difficult
role of the law enforcement agencies in tracking down law breakers,
the august role of the judiciary in painstakingly pouring and sifting
through time consuming cases can only be cause for praise and admiration,
yet a speedy trial is a must and if indeed clinching evidence exists
then proceed they must, expeditiously to avoid soul searching criticism
at a later date.
I revel in pride
being a citizen of India, I wonder and marvel at the vast amphitheatre
that life in the city affords us, a week where the city hosted a
genius scientist and a leader of the most aggressively developed
nation China, yet I'm left with a niggling doubt about the state
of our city if the underworld is really dictating terms from behind
the veil of a terrorist state. Is anyone really safe?
|