|
January
20, 2002
|
|
Straight
Face
|
The most dangerous place?
I AM
not too sure whether I agree with Old Bill Clinton that we are living
in the most volatile region in the world. But there can be absolutely
no doubt that we are living in the most voluble region in the world.
People
in these parts move around with the constant fear that some loose
adjective or noun, some expression of eloquence or a shard of some
couplet, will in an unguarded moment neatly decapitate them or sock
them in the solar plexus.
So
much wind, in fact, is being created in the process, that energy
experts should now seriously consider this committed source and
plumb for the wind energy option to solve the on-going power crisis.
On
one side of the border, we have a General-President — or is it President-General?
— of Pakistan, who has come to rather mistakenly believe that he
is a television star and has oratorical capabilities that can stand
up to Julius Caesar’s, on a good day.
On
the other side of the border, we have a Prime Minister-Poet — or
is it Poet-Prime Minister? — of India, who doesn’t believe in keeping
his thoughts to himself and has, very erroneously, come to the conclusion
that his musings are worthy of a Kalidasa and of being translated
into extremely long newspaper spreads.
Caught
between the rock, of Musharraf’s rhetoric, and the hard place of
Vajpayee’s poetics, are the poor citizens of both nations wondering
what had hit them.
This
is a perilous, hazardous, risky arraignment, make no mistake. Not
only is the fourth largest army in the world in battle formation
against the fifth largest army in the world. Not only is one nuclear
state poised against another nuclear state. Not only is Uncle Colin
Powellji flying off and leaving us in the cold, not to speak of
Uncle Georgieji choking himself on pretzels and getting himself
into a blue funk.
All
this is bad enough, but what makes the situation truly unstable
is the imminent possibility of someone or the other on both sides
of the border shooting their mouths off and leaving us, not in an
eyeball-to-eyeball face-off as some excitable newspaper analysts
have stated recently, but a vocal-chords-to-vocal-chords confrontation
which, in my humble opinion, is extremely dangerous too.
Musharraf,
if you haven’t been warned, is already threatening to Address The
Nation for another couple of hours very shortly — even before his
unfortunate compatriots can get their reflexes working and rush
to the market to equip themselves with some durable ear muffs. Vajpayee
is not a television man, as you may have noticed.
He
either falls asleep before the startled eyeballs of his nation,
or — if he manages to drone on and on — puts everybody else to sleep.
Either
way, there is a sorry breakdown in communication which doesn’t help
his cause. But I have it on excellent authority that the Muse of
Vajpayee’s Musings has just armed himself with a dozen free-flo
ceramic tipped ball pens to capture his master’s voice and then
have it translated into printers’ ink splashed over the front pages
of an estimated 45,000 newspapers in the country.
Both
leaders, it seems, have translated their right to freedom of speech
into state policy and have, in the process, stood the old Shakespearean
dictum, ‘‘give every man thine ear, but few thy voice’’, on its
head. For them it is ‘‘give every man thine voice, but few thy ear’’.
One
of them, you would have noticed, begins his fusillade, with the
benign words, ‘‘My dear fellow countrymen (the women are taken for
granted as usual)’’ and then proceeds to work himself into quite
a lather before ending rather grandly with the words ‘‘May the Almighty
give us strength to redeem this resolve’’. The other begins smoothly
with, ‘‘Pakistani Brothers and Sisters...’’ and then proceeds to
blather on for a long while before descending down to earth with
some help from — you guessed it — the Almighty. ‘‘May God guide
us to act upon the true teachings of Islam...’’
Actually,
if the Almighty has to help anybody it is the hapless people of
both nations who need every assistance, natural and supernatural,
to negotiate this tide of words without getting drowned. It is my
belief that what they need, most of all, is a verbal missile shield,
with early warning systems — possibly the Arrow series of anti-rhetorical
ballistic missiles if the Americans will relent on this — to cope
with more spiel coming their way. Or, if they cannot manage that,
they should get their respective leaders to enter into a ‘‘no first
use’’ agreement. Or, if even this cannot be ensured, they must get
them to come up with a less verbose way to appear honourable.
|