|
April
11, 2002
|
|
The
consensus route to Rashtrapati Bhavan
|
Executive
decisions
Can't
we all just get along? That was Rodney Kings appeal
to his fellow Angelenos as their city went up in flames in 1992.
What was especially poignant was the fact that the rioting began
after four (white) policemen were acquitted though a videotape showed
them thrashing the (black) Rodney King. History records that Kings
ardent plea went unanswered. When emotions reach a certain point,
appeals to reason seem futile.
Parliament
is the supreme forum for reasoned debate, but it fell short of that
ideal in the rancorous exchanges over Poto. Indias problems
seem as tangled as anything woven by Gordius of Phrygia, and there
is little hope of reconciliation in the months to come. Looming
ahead, to name but one potential source of confrontation, is the
election of a new president.
The
National Democratic Alliance and the Opposition each have roughly
45 per cent of the votes required. The balance is held by the Bahujan
Samaj Party, the Nationalist Congress Party, the AIADMK and various
small parties from the Northeast. The stage seems set for another
round of bitter words and hard haggling. Or is it?
The
problem of the Gordian Knot was solved by Alexander. And, as it
happens, India has an Alexander waiting in the wings...
I refer
to P.C. Alexander, currently governor of Maharashtra. He has served
three Congress prime ministers Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi
and Narasimha Rao with distinction. The last of those three
named him a governor; it says something of Alexander that he was
reconfirmed by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee ministry.
If
you think it easy to get Rao and Vajpayee to agree on something,
I must point out Alexander has succeeded in making the lion lie
down with the lamb elsewhere too. I have yet to hear any kind words
from the Shiv Sena for Sharad Pawars Nationalist Congress
Party, or vice versa, but both parties informally say that they
are willing to back Alexander. And across the peninsula even the
DMK and the AIADMK could, for a change, be on the same side of the
fence. (Alexander served as governor of Tamil Nadu before he was
shifted to Maharashtra.)
So,
could this be one of those rare occasions when there is concord
amongst the politicians? Well, there have been other miracles; five
years ago, K.R. Narayanan was raised to the highest office all but
unanimously. (The token opposition came with the Shiv Sena backing
the former chief election commissioner T.N. Seshan.)
As
it happens, I understand that there is some opposition to Alexanders
candidature and it is coming from unexpected quarters, namely
the Congress and the Left Front. Why is the first opposing a man
who has served successive Congress ministries so faithfully? Why
is the second against a man from Kerala, opposition that shall win
the Marxists no friends in one of their few strongholds?
The
Congress has nothing against Alexander as an individual, but the
party has little confidence in the people of India. The Congress
or at least a section of it thinks P.C. Alexanders
candidature is part of a conspiracy. They think that with a Christian
as the president it will be tougher to convince the electorate that
another Christian should be prime minister! (Personally, I think
they are just being sillier than usual; there are excellent reasons
to object to Sonia Gandhi becoming prime minister, but her religion
isnt one of them.)
Obviously,
Congressmen cannot afford to voice their suspicions in precisely
those words. Therefore, some of them are trying to raise objections
on more technical grounds. For instance, some of them are trying
to convince people that it runs against tradition to have two successive
men from the same state, Kerala, in Rashtrapati Bhavan. Others wonder
whether it is really the done thing to have one former bureaucrat
follow another (K.R. Narayanan was in the foreign service for several
decades). Pardon me, but do these arguments really make much sense?
Alexander
is a man of proven administrative aptitude. He is not associated
with any political party. (Narayanan won three elections to the
Lok Sabha on a Congress ticket.) Does it really matter which state
he hails from, or that he was a bureaucrat before becoming a governor?
Equally
valid, is there anyone else who can become president without causing
the same bitterness we witnessed in the Poto debate? The Left Front
thinks it has the answer: K.R. Narayanan once again. The Marxists
like him because he is seen as one of the Socialist Old Guard in
this age of economic liberalisation. But will President Narayanan
run once more?
I suppose
he might if he could be elected unanimously. But this is
highly unlikely. While the president is acknowledged to have done
a good job, there are sections in the National Democratic Alliance
who would be less than enthusiastic about giving him another five-year
term. (Nobody but Dr Rajendra Prasad has had that honour.)
If
it cannot be K.R. Narayanan or P.C. Alexander, who can it be? There
is no shortage of potential candidates, to be honest.
The
most obvious is the current vice-president. Some have dropped the
names of L.M. Singhvi and Karan Singh. And the irrepressible Ram
Jethmalani has already announced that he is interested. (Although
I must say damning the members of the electoral college as dumb
cattle obeying the party whip is not, in my opinion, calculated
to win friends!)
Under
other circumstances, I think we could be happy with any of them
in Rashtrapati Bhavan. But the problem is that it will be tough,
almost impossible, to build a consensus around any of them. Karan
Singh, for instance, is a scholar and a gentleman but the
BJP will remember him as the Congress candidate who stood from Lucknow
in the last general election. Singhvi is associated with the BJP
meaning that the Congress shall feel almost honour bound
to vote against him. And so it goes...
Close-fought
elections are exciting, but do we need any more contentious votes?
If consensus is required, P.C. Alexander is the man of the hour.
I return to where I started: can we all just get along or
will it be more riotous scenes and bitterness?
|