The demand by domestic power-plant manufacturers to extend 15 per cent price preference to them for private-sector power projects is justified. If the Exim Bank of a country extending project finance can insist on choosing an equipment supplier from that country, there is no reason why the domestic supplier of a country which is the only major market (other than China) for power-plant equipment (PPE) suppliers should not insist on price preference. If sanctions can be imposed on L&T because India exploded nuclear bombs, India is within its rights to insist that all equipment suppliers for power projects here will be domestic firms.A better way of achieving the same end is for domestic FIs and banks to insist that only those projects which have an Indian equipment supplier will be funded. It can be argued that foreign suppliers often supply critical parts. For example, for Frame 9 turbines, BHEL has to import critical components from GE, and it has to form a joint venture with Siemens for refurbishment ofpower plants. But it must be remembered that the technological agreement/joint venture has been entered into because the foreign player finds it profitable rather than do the project on its own.
The cost competitiveness of the local capital-goods industry can be judged from the fact BHEL has bagged 86 per cent of the projects under the international competitive route. Domestic manufacturers are competing against zero-duty imports, and duty benefits available to domestic players for deemed exports are notional, because cash is blocked.
Indian PPE suppliers have subsidised bankrupt SEBs by accepting payment as and when made. Under these conditions, Indian PPEs need all the help that they can get.
Copyright © 1998 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.