|
|
|
the
wondering eye
|
 |
|
RUPIKA
CHAWLA
|
Some time
ago, a collector brought me a Ram Kumar oil painting made
on board for restoration. The work belonged to the early ’60s,
which was the beginning of Ram Kumar’s abstract period.
It showed the disintegration of the human figure which had
started during this time, leading gradually to the abstraction
which has since come to be identified with Ram Kumar.
But what was more interesting was that on the reverse side
of the board there was another painting. Faint outlines were
visible through a yellowish application of oil paint. The
words ‘Ram Kumar ’61’ and the size of the painting was written
in green over the concealed work.
 |
| The Ram Kumar before (above) and after restoration |
 |
Hoping
to establish an idea about the work, which was hidden, I took
it for an x-ray. Unfortunately, all that the x-ray was able
to reveal was the grain of the board and the thick paint of
the painting on the obverse side, which in any case was obvious,
as it was the revealed painting.
I telephoned Ram Kumar who made a few valid points even though
he did not at that time remember this particular painting.
He had in all probability covered the painting as he did not
quite like it and wished to try something new, which meant
that he would have used the reverse side for this. On the
other hand, it was also possible that he had used the same
board as he could not, in those lean days, afford new ones
all the time.
Indian
contemporary painters, though creatively stimulated, had problems
of acquiring materials for painting during the ’50s and ’60s.
Contemporary art did not have the same kind of importance
it has today, resulting in certain sacrifices made by the
artists while purchasing art materials. This had a resultant
effect on the methods and techniques of painting. In Ram Kumar’s
case, it meant covering the painting with white paint, turning
it around, and making another painting on the bare side.
Over time, the white paint became a dirty yellow as it gradually
acquired a layer of dirt, and then it came to me for restoration.
With Ram Kumar’s information in the back of my mind, I sat
down to clean the work. Cautiously I removed small areas of
the dirt layer and then miniscule squares of the white paint.
I had to take care not to clean in one area for too long,
for then I would have endangered the painting I was working
at exposing. Removal of the white paint was done with chemicals
which could have affected the painting underneath had I not
been careful.
The work was absorbing for I had no idea what I was going
to unearth. Gradually they emerged, the family of three, under
the white and the dirty yellow, proof of Ram Kumar’s concluding
figurative phase, when form was overtaken by abstraction.
There was a certain incompleteness in some areas, which was
indicative of the fact that Ram Kumar had abandoned the painting
before completing it. I found his signature at the bottom
of the painting but I could not find the date. I decided to
keep the date in green ink that I had found earlier until
the time that he would date the painting himself.
This is not the first time that I came across a concealed
painting and it certainly was not the last but it is fascinating
every time it happens. Little mysteries like this arise to
throw a better light on the past life of a painting and help
in further art historical analysis.
The author is a Delhi-based art conservator
|