|
Time out -- Waiting for Derrida
Bhawesh K Mishra
Circa 1985. a wet pre-monsoon evening at a detribalized settlement
of engineers near Jamshedpur. Pre-television days in the deep south of
Bihar. BBC Radio's Hindi Service blaring: Onkarnath Sriastava already
declaring the inevitability of the Cold War's death. Rajiv Gandhi's dream
for a youth's India in hopeful circulation. Challenger is happening at NASA
(waiting to explode when fired). Gorby is trying to happen. Yet another
Harjinder Singh `Jinda' is caught. Longowal and Mahanta are heroes. Hate is
passe; peace is fashionable, all of a sudden.
Not the right time for a philosopher to surface. But Bush House thinks
otherwise, because Oxford University has finally decided to end a
four-century-old war of philosophies between the British Isles and the
Continent. A Frenchman who has elevated the study of words to the level of
proper epistemology is going to be awarded an honorary Ph.D. Jacques Derrida
is in London. David Hume's children are all clamour and fume. And BBC is
reporting it all.
I have heard of Derrida for the first time. I am destined to see him, listen
to him, feel sorry for him. But that will come later. In the meantime, I
will grow up knowing a whole lot of things about philosophy. Desi names like
Mohandas Ganghi and Rabindranath Tagore will cease to be philosophers.
Bertrand Russell will soon appear a big sham and Francis Bacon a mere
essayist. I will be happy to see Hume's theory of knowledge being overturned
by a provincial teacher named Emmanuel Kant. Barely out of college, I will
dream of visiting Frankfurt and Paris, as if Satre is sold in cans. The
temptation to drop as arcane a word as `discourse' while reporting on an
ailing hospital will sweep me.
Sooner than hoped, an ailment more malignant than philosophy grips me. It's
JNU. I am a student of modern history now, a member of that occult club
called CHS. History is philosophy and historians no poor chroniclers. A set
of one big hexagonal room and a couple of tiny rooms house raging academic
ambitions. Teachers are too erudite, too foreign. And I, consequently, a
misfit. But I am trying. Trying is imitating. I am learning to imitate. One
man, Majid, however, thinks I should learn, just learn. Majid is so great.
He will be disappointed. Derrida is coming.
Circa 1997. Finally, Derrida is here. A packed auditorium, hexagonal again.
The podium turns into a galaxy of academician stars lords of imported
knowledge in kurta-pajamas, in Wranglers, in suits. The lesser ones sitting
opposite are bursting at the seams. Lots of loose paper, notepads, teenaged
nibs. Sure, there are mortals around who have waited for this moment much
longer than my humble 12 years. The air is thick with anticipatory
enlightenment.
Derrida looks rather forlorn and tells us that he would speak on Algeria.
The gathering is slightly discouraged, but warms up soon. It's Algeria only,
just below the Mediterranean. Claude Levi-Strauss went all the way to the
Amazon morass and made it relevant. So, Derrida is speaking. Like most
Frenchmen's, his English accent is rather pregnant, but his delivery
remarkably smooth. The ambient air has turned thinner: expressions now more
on the side of yawning resignation. But why? We will know when the questions
come up.
In fact, I don't understand the questions as I have not understood much of
Derrida's lecture. But as counter-speeches (queries!) are made I am
convinced there was never a premium on comprehension. The gathering won't
admit that, however. It has been a grand display of furtive comprehension.
Mr Kurta-Pajama-Shawl interprets the lecture de novo. Mr Marquez-Moustache
overrules. The minions gawk, mutter, subside. Majid, our Majid, spurns it
all. Derrida, an atom spent, looks on. I do the same. For a moment the huge
gap between intellectual abilities is blurred.
When knowledge becomes a rivalry, fools (and geniuses) relapse in bliss.
Copyright © 1997 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.
|