|
Cauvery water talks caught in local politics
R K Mattoo
BANGALORE, May 1: ``Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M Karunanidhi's volte-face on
his earlier stand on the vexed Cauvery issue at the January 5 bilateral
talks between the two states is directly linked to the release of former
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalitha from jail on January 3,'' according
to Karnataka Major Irrigation Minister K N Nage Gowda.
Nage Gowda, who played a vital role during the four rounds of talks between
the two states on Cauvery, told The Indian Express that it was unfortunate
that a political stalwart like Karunanidhi should backtrack on the issue
which had almost been settled through bilateral negotiations at the instance
of the Supreme Court. ``We are back to square one'', he said
``Karunanidhi was very cordial during the first three rounds of talks and
the two states had almost sorted out the problem. But on January 5, the
delegation from Karnataka led by Karnataka Chief Minister J H Patel was
given a good dinner, besides a press release virtually saying that the issue
would be resolved by the Tribunal,'' he said.
Nage Gowda said that the first meeting held at Madras, at the instance of
the Supreme Court, was a cordial one. Infact, it was Karunanidhi who first
telephoned to Patel and fixed the meeting, saying that they were the
constituents of the United Front Government at the Centre. This was
reciprocated by Patel who agreed for the meeting despite severe criticism
from the opposition parties in Karnataka.
The meeting followed the release of water to Tamil Nadu amid a hue and cry
by the opposition parties, including farmers from the Cauvery basin. ``I
still remember Karrunanidhi's words that we are in one line....Delhi, Tamil
Nadu and Karnataka are ruled by the Front constituents...,''said Nage Gowda.
At the second meeting at Delhi, held in the presence of Deve Gowda, it was
agreed that the issue be resolved through negotiations. ``Mr Deve Gowda even
said that we are all from South and must sort out the problem through
negotiations,'' Nage Gowda said.
It was only during this meeting that the two states decided to install a new
`veir' (measurement point) near Beligundalu, a sensitive point in the area.
It was also decided that the `veir' would be managed by the Central Water
Commission .
Nage Gowda said that the Delhi meeting was followed by yet another meeting
at Bangalore and besides agreeing to have a `veir', it was also decided that
two balancing reservoirs at Mekedatu in Karnataka and Hogenakkal in Tamil
Nadu, would be set up, to be used for power and irrigation purposes. Since
keeping water at Mekedatu would not serve any purpose for irrigation,
Karnataka wanted to have a power project instead.
Deve Gowda had even committed himself to treat both the projects as National
projects and promised to release funds from the Centre as Karunanidhi had
pleaded his helplessness as far as financing the project was concerned.
Karnataka Government had even agreed to give clearance for the Hogenekkal
project.
The fourth meeting had discussed the quantum of water to be released to
Tamil Nadu. Karnataka had argued that the interim award of 205 tmc was not
practical as there was no water available when Tamil Nadu needed water. It
was mutually agreed that the release of water should depend on the
percentage of water available.
Tamil Nadu wanted 45 per cent for its State and Pondicherry and remaining 55
per cent to be shared between Karnataka and Kerala. After a lot of
deliberations, Karnataka agreed to give 33 per cent while TN agreed for 40
per cent. TMC leader G K Moopanar too was involved in the negotiations and
he too had expressed satisfaction over the progress of talks.
It was Karunanidhi who had fixed January 5 as the date for the fifth and
final round of talks during his visit to Hosur Nage Gowda said that
Karunanidhi was a completely changed man on January 5.
Ignoring the series of discussions on the issue in the past, he did not
show any interest and wanted to avoid the talks.
Probably, Karunanidhi had become conscious of the political repercussions
of the release of Jayalalitha, he said.
Tamil Nadu Public Works Minister Durai Murugan today refuted former Chief
Minister J Jayalalitha accusations over the vexed Cauvery water
dispute.Refuting Jayalalitha's charge that Chief Minister M Karunanidhi had
failed to take steps to prevent Karnataka from constructing dams, he said
the construction had begun before he assumed office as Public Works Minister
in 1967 but still, he tried his level best to get the construction
stopped.In a rejoinder, he said while the construction of Kabini dam began
in 1958, construction of Hemavathy and Sornavathy began in 1966. Despite
this, Karunanidhi registered protest with his Karnataka counterpart
Veerendra Patil only in 1968, in the presence of Union Irrigation Minister K
L Rao and sought the Centre's intervention to stop the construction He again
held talks with the Karnataka Chief Minister on February 17, 1970 and wrote
to the Centre the same day pressing for the setting up of a tribunal to
resolve the issue. Again in April, May and October in 1970, Karunanidhi held
talks with the chief ministers of the riparian states in Rao's presence over
the storage of water in the constructed dams.
Copyright © 1997 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.
|