|
`Regulatory bodies need a regulator'
ENS ECONOMIC BUREAU
MUMBAI, July 5: The capital market needs to put in place a senior regulatory
body which can overlook decisions made by the regulatory bodies directly
monitoring market intermediaries, according to Dr S A Dave, former chairman
of the UTI.
Addressing newspersons at a press conference held here to mark the release
of the report on `Infrastructure for Capital Market', Dave said a senior
regulatory body could help ensure that the markets do not suffer due to the
lack of coordination and information-sharing between regulators.
The committee formed by the Association of Merchant Bankers of India (AMBI)
which came out with the report under the chairmanship of Dr Dave suggests
the need to establish joint crisis-handling procedures between Sebi, RBI and
other government agencies involved in the financial markets.
The report also suggests the creation of a special tribunal, called the
capital markets tribunal, to help the swift adjudication of disputes between
the capital market participants. Another way of improving dispute resolution
is by conscious encouragement of arbitration, preferably through
self-regulatory organisations such as Ambi and Amfi.
In another recommendation, the Dave committee has suggested the creation of
a single investor protection corporation instead of multiple ones to help
speed up the process of compensation and restore the confidence of
investors. The report says that India could follow the system followed in
the US where the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) was
formed under an Act of the Congress.
Another suggestion made was the need to eliminate the `Closed User Group'
(CUG) policy adopted by the department of telecommuncations (DoT) which has
proved to be a major impediment to the interlinking of two networks. The
report states, "Service providers should have no powers over the content
that is caried over their wires. Whether a line carries voice or data or fax
or is used for some kind of computer networking, the service provider should
charge a price for bandwidth and then have no locus standi in dictating how
bandwidth can or cannot be used."
The panel also emphasised the need to upgrade the legal, institutional,
knowledge and technological infrastructure in the capital markets to face
the global challenges in the 21st century.
As regards the primary market, the report says that Sebi should modify Book
Building guidelines. The committee has also recommended market-making as a
method for improving liquidity and hence reducing cost of capital for small
mid-cap companies. According to Dave "Venture Capital should be actively
used as a method for funding high-risk small projects, small mid-cap
companies." The report further said that information should be easily
available which will ensure quality and quantity of research. This would be
possible if public institutions follow continous disclosure norms. Bigger
corporates should be required to release a summary statement of the balance
sheet on a quarterly basis. On derivatives, he said there should be a
separate regulatory agency to monitor these instruments and also take a
composite view of the trading in derivatives.
Securitisation is another point which has been tackled by the committee
which recommended that the government should create a committee to study the
problems that inhibit asset securitisation and should also look into some
precise regulations to enable securitisation in India to take place.
|