Search Button
Net Express Sections
The Indian Express

The Financial Express


Latest News

Express Investment Week

Market Indicators

Screen

Express Computers

Travel & Tourism

Advertisers Forum



Daily Horoscope

Information Technology

Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar

Astrosurf

Gems &Jewellery

Banking Update

Dr. Know --Express Online Fax Services

Screen: The Business of Entertainment


Career India

Business Forum

Match Maker

Express Properties


Politics

Business

Expressions

General

Sports

Leisure

States

 

10 January 1998

Govt told to hurry up on Bill against quacks 

EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE  
NEW DELHI, January 9: Expressing dissatisfaction over the non-enactment of the Delhi Quackery Prohibition Bill in the Capital, the Delhi High Court today said the city government should take necessary measures to pass the Bill.

Hearing a petition against quacks, a division bench comprising Justices Y.K. Sabharwal and Dr M.K. Sharma observed: "We hope the Bill will be made an Act before April 14, the next date of hearing."

The city government had introduced the Bill on August 28, 1997, in the Assembly after reports that as many as 30,000 quacks were practicing in the Delhi.

On March 11 last year, the bench, in an interim order on a petition filed by the Indian Medical Association (IMA) had said that those persons who were practicing without a recognised degree should be prosecuted.

Earlier, arguing for the city government, counsel Arvind Nigam said the Bill was pending before the Assembly, which was currently not in session.

However, counsel for the petitioner Devinder Singh had pointed out that evenas the government was introducing an anti-quackery Bill in the Assembly, the Chief Minister, while addressing a demonstration organised by quacks, had promised that no action would be taken against them. Nigam agreed with the court on the importance of enacting the anti-quackery law as the present legislation providing for a meagre fine of Rs 500 "is hardly a deterrent against quackery."

The government, he said, was not against the practice of a person in that sphere of medicine in which he has obtained a degree but it was of the firm view that there should be no cross-practicing: A person qualified in Ayurveda should not practice modern medicine.

A question was raised during the last hearing that a similar petition was pending before the Supreme Court, and whether in that event the high court should proceed with the matter.

Appearing for the national integrated medical association, advocate Pramod Gupta gave details of the issues pending before the apex court in connection with practice by quacks.

Petitioner's counsel submitted that though specific information regarding alleged practice by over 500 quacks was given to the Delhi Police, the latter had taken action against only six.

Copyright © 1998 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.



LIC

Bank of India

Godrej Indaia

 

Bottom banner spot