Search Button

The Indian Express

The Financial Express


Latest News

World News

EIW


Market Indicators


Screen

Express Computers

Graffiti

Crossword



Advertisers Forum

Travel & Tourism

Information Technology

Drumbeat: Ad Buzzaar

Astrosurf

Eco-India

Dr Know

Screen: The Business of Entertainment

Career India

Business Forum

Match Maker

Express Properties


Politics

Business

Expressions

General

Sports

Leisure

States

 

Tuesday, May 5, 1998

Caution is the word

 
The BJP's keenness not to fritter away the opportunity it got at the Centre was evident in all its deliberations at Gandhinagar. The party seems to realise that it has reached a stage in its growth when it can no longer adopt jingoistic policies, be it on Hindutva or economic reforms. It is for this very reason that neither the new party chief, Kushabhau Thakre, nor his predecessor and Home Minister, L.K. Advani, made any reference to such contentious issues as Article 370, the Ram temple at Ayodhya and a uniform civil code in their speeches. Even the political resolution was silent on these issues while laying emphasis on the National Agenda for Governance, formulated by the BJP and its allies. Obviously, the party does not want to take any chances, lest it should jeopardise the Vajpayee government.

Moreover, having always complained about other political parties not allowing it to come to power, the party has to prove that it can also be trusted with power. After all, its future now depends squarely onthe performance of the government, rather than any slogans the party coins. It is of little consequence who leads the party or what programmes it pursues. Under Advani, the party had grown phenomenally, thanks mainly to the purposive leadership he provided, the hallmark of which was Hindutva. But successive elections to both the Lok Sabha and state assemblies showed that its appeal had reached a plateau.

But for this saturation, the BJP would not have faced the compulsions of running a coalition of disparate parties. As it looks ahead, it cannot be oblivious to the limitations of Hindutva in a country of heterogeneous cultures. Election results have conclusively proved that the razing of the Babri Masjid in 1992 did not have the approval of the majority of even those who were enthused by Hindutva. In the last elections, it was the strategic alliance that the BJP forged with some regional parties and the diminished image of the Congress on account of the corruption charges its leaders face that helped theparty. To really fill the slot vacated by the Congress, the BJP has to attract to its fold a vast section of the population which has so far remained aloof from the party. The BJP would have been in a comfortable position to provide a government of its own if only a significant section of the minorities had sided with the party in the last elections. Besides, the BJP also has to reverse its record as a non-performer, as underscored by the fact that the party was voted out at the first available opportunity in all the states where it came to power. Yet, when Thakre or Advani refers to Hindutva in a loose manner, it only means that the BJP cannot altogether abandon its distinctive agenda, particularly when there is uncertainty about the durability of the coalition it heads. Now that the party is in power, it will be judged by what it does rather than what it says. The exhortation to the minorities to leave the pseudo-secularists and join hands with the BJP will carry greater conviction if the party restrainsloose cannons in the Sangh Parivar, who make periodic threats to repeat Ayodhya at Kashi and Mathura.

Copyright © 1998 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.



LIC

Bank of India

Godrej India

 

Touchwood Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.