Repeated enquiries into the reasons for delay in the result revealed another story. The candidate, Chanchal Narang, who is a student of the local SGGS College had secured 62 marks out of 70, and not 27 as mentioned in her result! The error on the part of the university had cost her 35 marks.

Since then she has been writing to the university to declare her result at the earliest. Delay in the declaration of her result of B.A.(I) would also affect her result in second year. The Controller of Examinations when apprised of the case conceded that an error had been committed. He stated that the error had taken place last year, and promised rectification of the result. It is learnt that following detection of the error, the university did pursue the case and initiated steps for correcting the error. However, a correction in the result requires a separate result notification to be issued.